Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30052293›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2018

A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI.

Alberto De Luca, Alexander Leemans, Alessandra Bertoldo, Filippo Arrigoni, Martijn Froeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto De LucaPROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2553-7299
Alexander LeemansPROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Alessandra BertoldoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6262-6354
Filippo ArrigoniNeuroimaging Lab, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-1149
Martijn FroelingRadiology Department, UMC Utrecht and Utrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-0497

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) 639.072.411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) signal measured in vivo arises from multiple diffusion domains, including hindered and restricted water pools, free water and blood pseudo-diffusion. Not accounting for the correct number of components can bias metrics obtained from model fitting because of partial volume effects that are present in, for instance, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Approaches that aim to overcome this shortcoming generally make assumptions about the number of considered components, which are not likely to hold for all voxels. The spectral analysis of the dMRI signal has been proposed to relax assumptions on the number of components. However, it currently requires a clinically challenging signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and accounts only for two diffusion processes defined by hard thresholds. In this work, we developed a method to automatically identify the number of components in the spectral analysis, and enforced its robustness to noise, including outlier rejection and a data-driven regularization term. Furthermore, we showed how this method can be used to take into account partial volume effects in DTI and DKI fitting. The proof of concept and performance of the method were evaluated through numerical simulations and in vivo MRI data acquired at 3 T. With simulations our method reliably decomposed three diffusion components from SNR = 30. Biases in metrics derived from DTI and DKI were considerably reduced when components beyond hindered diffusion were taken into account. With the in vivo data our method determined three macro-compartments, which were consistent with hindered diffusion, free water and pseudo-diffusion. Taking free water and pseudo-diffusion into account in DKI resulted in lower mean diffusivity and higher fractional anisotropy values in both gray and white matter. In conclusion, the proposed method allows one to determine co-existing diffusion compartments without prior assumptions on their number, and to account for undesired signal contaminations within clinically achievable SNR levels.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingBrainComputer SimulationHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWaterWaterbraindiffusion MRIDKIDTIfree waterIVIMkurtosis

Identifiers

PMID30052293
PMCPMC6221109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.