ArticleNMR in biomedicine2018
Brain investigations of rodent disease models by chemical exchange saturation transfer at 21.1 T.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guanidinium and amide CEST mapping of human brain by high spectral resolution CEST at 3 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Sensitivity enhancement of homonuclear multidimensional NMR correlations for labile sites in proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores opportunities opened up by ultrahigh fields for in vivo saturation transfer brain magnetic resonance imaging experiments. Fast spin-echo images weighted by chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects were collected on Sprague-Dawley rats at 21.1 T, focusing on two neurological models. One involved a middle cerebral artery occlusion emulating ischemic stroke; the other involved xenografted glioma cells that were followed over the course of several days as they developed into brain tumors. A remarkably strong saturation-derived contrast was observed for the growing tumors when calculating magnetization transfer ratios at c. 3.8 ppm. This large contrast originated partially from an increase in the contribution of the amide CEST effect, but mostly from strong decreases in the Overhauser and magnetization transfer contributions to the upfield region, whose differential attenuations could be clearly discerned thanks to the ultrahigh field. The high spectral separation arising at 21.1 T also revealed numerous CEST signals usually overlapping at lower fields. Ischemic lesions were also investigated but, remarkably, magnetization and saturation transfer contrasts were nearly absent when computing transfer asymmetries using either high or low saturation power schemes. These behaviors were consistently observed at 24 hours post-occlusion, regardless of the data processing approach assayed. Considerations related to how various parameters defining these experiments depend on the magnetic field, primarily chemical shifts and T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.