Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30052187›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2018

Ontario and New Zealand Pharmaceuticals: Cost and Coverage.

Leah T Kelley, Tim Tenbensel, Ana Johnson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. It Won't Be Easy: How to Make Universal Pharmacare Work in Canada.International journal of health policy and management · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah T KelleyResearch Assistant, Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Tim TenbenselAssociate Professor, Health Systems Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ana JohnsonAssociate Professor, Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ontario is a strong candidate for a comprehensive pharmacare program, given that it has a pre-existing public drug benefit program (the Ontario Drug Benefit Program [ODBP]). This paper outlines strategies from New Zealand's national pharmacare program (the Pharmaceutical Management Agency [PHARMAC]) and compares these strategies to other international examples. It is recommended that the ODBP engage in three strategies currently utilized by the PHARMAC to achieve significant cost savings and create potential to increase their insurance coverage: (i) strict budgeting; (ii) tendering and negotiating; and (iii) reference pricing.

Indexed as

Drug CostsInsurance CoverageNational Health ProgramsBudgetsCosts and Cost AnalysisCost SavingsHumansNegotiatingNew ZealandOntarioProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30052187
PMCPMC6044260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.