Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051975›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2018

LY2495655, an antimyostatin antibody, in pancreatic cancer: a randomized, phase 2 trial.

Talia Golan, Ravit Geva, Donald Richards, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Boris Kin Lin, Haofei Tiffany Wang, Richard A Walgren, Salomon M Stemmer

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Muscle Disuse Atrophy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Talia GolanSheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ravit GevaSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Donald RichardsUS Oncology Research, Tyler, TX, USA.
Srinivasan MadhusudanAcademic Oncology, University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Boris Kin LinEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Haofei Tiffany WangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Richard A WalgrenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Salomon M StemmerRabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRabin Medical Center · ILSheba Medical Center · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCachexia is a formidable clinical challenge in pancreatic cancer. We assessed LY2495655 (antimyostatin antibody) plus standard-of-care chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer using cachexia status as a stratifier.

methodsIn this randomized, phase 2 trial, patients with stage II-IV pancreatic cancer were randomized to 300 mg LY2495655, 100 mg LY2495655, or placebo, plus physician-choice chemotherapy from a prespecified list of standard-of-care regimens for first and later lines of care. Investigational treatment was continued during second-line treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

resultsOverall, 125 patients were randomized. In August 2014, 300 mg LY2495655 was terminated due to imbalance in death rates between the treatment arms; in January 2015, 100 mg LY2495655 treatment was terminated due to futility. LY2495655 did not improve overall survival: the hazard ratio was 1.70 (90% confidence interval, 1.1-2.7) for 300 mg vs. placebo and 1.3 (0.82-2.1) for 100 mg vs. placebo (recommended doses). Progression-free survival results were consistent with the overall survival results. A numerically higher hazard ratio was observed in patients with weight loss (WL) of ≥5% (cachexia) than with <5% WL within 6 months before randomization. Subgroup analyses for patients stratified by WL in the 6 months preceding enrollment suggested that functional responses to LY2495655 (either dose) may have been superior in patients with <5% WL vs. patients with ≥5% WL. Among possibly drug-related adverse events, fatigue, diarrhoea, and anorexia were more common in LY2495655-treated than in placebo-treated patients.

conclusionsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, LY2495655 did not confer clinical benefit in pancreatic cancer. Our data highlight the importance of assessing survival when investigating therapeutic management of cachexia and support the use of WL as a stratifier (independent of performance status).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetreatmentSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentslandogrozumabCachexiaMuscle massMyostatinPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID30051975
PMCPMC6204586
OpenAlexW2883614888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.