Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051937›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2018

Multistep mutational transformation of a protein fold through structural intermediates.

Vlad K Kumirov, Emily M Dykstra, Branwen M Hall, William J Anderson, Taylor N Szyszka, Matthew H J Cordes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fold-Switching Proteins.Annual review of biophysics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional and Regulatory Roles of Fold-Switching Proteins.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vlad K KumirovDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.
Emily M DykstraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.
Branwen M HallDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.
William J AndersonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.
Taylor N SzyszkaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.
Matthew H J CordesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0088.

Funding

CHEMISTRY-BIOLOGY INTERFACE TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MONTFORT, WILLIAM R. · 2003 to 2023
$3.9M
Conformational Switching in ProteinsR01GM066806 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CORDES, MATTHEW HJ · 2003 to 2012
$2.5M
THE CONVERSION OF NONCODING SEQUENCES INTO PROTEINSR01GM104040 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CORDES, MATTHEW HJ, MASEL, JOANNA · 2013 to 2016
$839k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066806NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104040NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New protein folds may evolve from existing folds through metamorphic evolution involving a dramatic switch in structure. To mimic pathways by which amino acid sequence changes could induce a change in fold, we designed two folded hybrids of Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6, a pair of homologous Cro protein sequences with ~40% identity but different folds (all-α vs. α + β, respectively). Each hybrid, XPH1 or XPH2, is 85% identical in sequence to its parent, Xfaso 1 or Pfl 6, respectively; 55% identical to its noncognate parent; and ~70% identical to the other hybrid. XPH1 and XPH2 also feature a designed hybrid chameleon sequence corresponding to the C-terminal region, which switched from α-helical to β-sheet structure during Cro evolution. We report solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of XPH1 and XPH2 at 0.3 Å and 0.5 Å backbone root mean square deviation (RMSD), respectively. XPH1 retains a global fold generally similar to Xfaso 1, and XPH2 retains a fold similar to Pfl 6, as measured by TM-align scores (~0.7), DALI Z-scores (7-9), and backbone RMSD (2-3 Å RMSD for the most ordered regions). However, these scores also indicate significant deviations in structure. Most notably, XPH1 and XPH2 have different, and intermediate, secondary structure content relative to Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6. The multistep progression in sequence, from Xfaso 1 to XPH1 to XPH2 to Pfl 6, thus involves both abrupt and gradual changes in folding pattern. The plasticity of some protein folds may allow for "polymetamorphic" evolution through intermediate structures.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMutationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsProteinschimerafolding specificityhybrid sequencemetamorphic proteinNMR spectroscopyStructural evolution

Identifiers

PMID30051937
PMCPMC6199151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.