Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051914›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2019

Bayesian inference of hub nodes across multiple networks.

Junghi Kim, Kim-Anh Do, Min Jin Ha, Christine B Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junghi KimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Kim-Anh DoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Min Jin HaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Christine B PetersonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-0468

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
Targeting Tumor Microenvironment-Induced Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisP50CA140388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOGOTHETIS, CHRISTOPHER J., THOMPSON, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$23.4M
EDRN--DATA MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATING CENTERU01CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FENG, ZIDING · 2000 to 2010
$16.9M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Proteomic-based integrated subject-specific networks in cancerR21CA220299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, HA, MIN JIN · 2018 to 2019
$378k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140388NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220299NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hub nodes within biological networks play a pivotal role in determining phenotypes and disease outcomes. In the multiple network setting, we are interested in understanding network similarities and differences across different experimental conditions or subtypes of disease. The majority of proposed approaches for joint modeling of multiple networks focus on the sharing of edges across graphs. Rather than assuming the network similarities are driven by individual edges, we instead focus on the presence of common hub nodes, which are more likely to be preserved across settings. Specifically, we formulate a Bayesian approach to the problem of multiple network inference which allows direct inference on shared and differential hub nodes. The proposed method not only allows a more intuitive interpretation of the resulting networks and clearer guidance on potential targets for treatment, but also improves power for identifying the edges of highly connected nodes. Through simulations, we demonstrate the utility of our method and compare its performance to current popular methods that do not borrow information regarding hub nodes across networks. We illustrate the applicability of our method to inference of co-expression networks from The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian carcinoma dataset.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer GraphicsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansOvarian NeoplasmsSystems BiologyBayesian modelingGaussian graphical modelHub nodeMultiple networks

Identifiers

PMID30051914
PMCPMC6393214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.