Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051860›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Has adaptation occurred in males and females since separate sexes evolved in the plant

Niklaus Zemp, Alex Widmer, Deborah Charlesworth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sexy ways: approaches to studying plant sex chromosomes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptive changes of the autosomal part of the genome in a dioecious clade ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Development of the VIGS System in the Dioecious PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Niklaus ZempInstitute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0991-5130
Alex WidmerInstitute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-5137
Deborah CharlesworthInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, Midlothian, Scotland deborah.charlesworth@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3939-9122
ETH Zurich · CHInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESSwiss Integrative Center for Human Health · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of separate sexes may involve changed expression of many genes, as each sex adapts to its new state. Evidence is accumulating for sex differences in expression even in organisms that have recently evolved separate sexes from hermaphrodite or monoecious (cosexual) ancestors, such as some dioecious flowering plants. We describe evidence that a dioecious plant species with recently evolved dioecy,

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalEvolution, MolecularSilenedioecyflower developmentgene expressionhermaphroditesexually antagonistic selection

Identifiers

PMID30051860
PMCPMC6083269
OpenAlexW2883267188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.