Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051842›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Heaviside's dolphins (

Morgan J Martin, Tess Gridley, Simon H Elwen, Frants H Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Heaviside's dolphins (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morgan J MartinMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, c/o Sea Search Research and Conservation NPC, 4 Bath Rd, Cape Town 7945, South Africa mjmartin@sandiego.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-6632
Tess GridleyCentre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, c/o Sea Search Research and Conservation NPC, 4 Bath Rd, Cape Town 7945, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-9270
Simon H ElwenMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, c/o Sea Search Research and Conservation NPC, 4 Bath Rd, Cape Town 7945, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7467-6121
Frants H JensenAarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-3606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The costs of predation may exert significant pressure on the mode of communication used by an animal, and many species balance the benefits of communication (e.g. mate attraction) against the potential risk of predation. Four groups of toothed whales have independently evolved narrowband high-frequency (NBHF) echolocation signals. These signals help NBHF species avoid predation through acoustic crypsis by echolocating and communicating at frequencies inaudible to predators such as mammal-eating killer whales. Heaviside's dolphins (

Indexed as

EcholocationFeeding BehaviorFood ChainAnimalsAtlantic OceanDolphinsNamibiaWhale, Killeracoustic crypsisactive spacecommunicationecholocationHeaviside's dolphinnarrowband high-frequency clicks

Identifiers

PMID30051842
PMCPMC6083265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.