Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051793›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2018

Patient contact is the main risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of healthcare workers' gloves and gowns in the intensive care unit.

Sarah S Jackson, Kerri A Thom, Laurence S Magder, Kristen A Stafford, J Kristie Johnson, Loren G Miller, David P Calfee, Anthony D Harris, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re-visiting contact precautions - 25 years on.Journal of infection prevention · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah S JacksonUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kerri A ThomUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Laurence S MagderUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kristen A StaffordUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Kristie JohnsonUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Loren G MillerLA BioMed at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
David P CalfeeWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Anthony D HarrisUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Funding

Epidemiology of CRE and MRSA transmission: patient and organism factorsR01AI121146 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HARRIS, ANTHONY D · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000450NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine which healthcare worker (HCW) roles and patient care activities are associated with acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) on HCW gloves or gowns after patient care, as a surrogate for transmission to other patients.

designProspective cohort study.

settingMedical and surgical intensive care units at a tertiary-care academic institution.ParticipantsVRE-colonized patients on Contact Precautions and their HCWs.

methodsOverall, 94 VRE-colonized patients and 469 HCW-patient interactions were observed. Research staff recorded patient care activities and cultured HCW gloves and gowns for VRE before doffing and exiting patient room.

resultsVRE were isolated from 71 of 469 HCWs' gloves or gowns (15%) following patient care. Occupational/physical therapists, patient care technicians, nurses, and physicians were more likely than environmental services workers and other HCWs to have contaminated gloves or gowns. Compared to touching the environment alone, the odds ratio (OR) for VRE contamination associated with touching both the patient (or objects in the immediate vicinity of the patient) and environment was 2.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-0.77) and the OR associated with touching only the patient (or objects in the immediate vicinity) was 3.65 (95% CI, 1.17-11.41). Independent risk factors for transmission of VRE to HCWs were touching the patient's skin (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.15-4.13) and transferring the patient into or out of bed (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.15-6.43).

conclusionPatient contact is a major risk factor for HCW contamination and subsequent transmission. Interventions should prioritize contact precautions and hand hygiene for HCWs whose activities involve touching the patient.

Indexed as

AgedCross InfectionEquipment ContaminationFemaleGloves, ProtectiveGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHealth PersonnelHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-PatientIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMarylandMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProtective Clothing

Identifiers

PMID30051793
PMCPMC6442931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.