ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Preoperative Evaluation of Tumor Adhesion to Adjacent Brain Tissue in Patients with Meningioma with BSMI Method and Its Comparison with the Width of Edema Around Tumor
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Surgical Cleavage Plane by Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Adult Intracranial Meningiomas.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to investigate the ability of BSMI, to preoperative evaluation of tumor adhesion to adjacent brain tissue in patients with meningioma and comparing this method to the width of edema around tumor, using surgery findings as the reference standard. Methods: Thirty patients with meningioma brain tumor who underwent surgery at Loghman hospital were selected for the study between November 2016 and January 2018. The level of edema according to the classification of Ide et al., (u1995) was compared with the surgical findings with blinded results, and neurosurgeons made a qualitative assessment of tumor adhesion at the time of resection. The ability of BSMI and level of edema to predict the surgical assessment of adhesion was tested using the Fisher Exact Test. Results: BSMI method was conducted on patients with meningioma brain tumor, which judged 22 (73.3%) patients as adhesion (+) and 8 (26.66%) patients as adhesion (-). In this case, there was a significant relationship between BSMI judgment and surgical findings (p-value<0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy was high, at 91.30%, 85.71%, 95.45% and 90%, respectively. Using T2-Weighted SPACE sequence, of the 30 patients, 13 (43.3%) were judged as adhesion (+) and 17 (56.7%) as adhesion (-) from edema, whereas surgical findings evaluated 23 (76.7%) as adhesion (+) and 7 (23.3%) as adhesion (-).The sensitivity was moderate but the specificity was high, at 52.17% and 85.71%, respectively. Other criteria such as precision and accuracy were 62.31% and 60%, respectively. Conclusions: BSMI evaluated adhesion of the tumor to the adjacent brain tissue with high-accuracy prior to surgery. This method was more effective than Edema method in evaluating adhesion between meningioma and the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.