Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051652›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Prospective associations between parental feeding practices and children's oral processing behaviours.

Anna Fogel, Lisa R Fries, Keri McCrickerd, Ai Ting Goh, Mei Jun Chan, Jia Ying Toh, Yap-Seng Chong, Kok Hian Tan, Fabian Yap, Lynette P Shek and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Anna FogelClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-0981
Lisa R FriesNestle Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Keri McCrickerdClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3171-7584
Ai Ting GohClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.
Mei Jun ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.
Jia Ying TohSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.
Yap-Seng ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.
Kok Hian TanKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Fabian YapKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Lynette P ShekSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.
Michael J MeaneyClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.
Birit F P BroekmanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.
Yung Seng LeeSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-0557
Keith M GodfreyMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit and National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4643-0618
Mary Foong Fong ChongClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.
Ciarán G FordeClinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4001-9182
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGNestlé (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/31749Medical Research Council MC_U147574222Medical Research Council MC_U147574226Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1017Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4Medical Research Council MR/J000094/1UK Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research demonstrated that faster eating rates are linked with increased intake of energy during a meal. Here, we examined whether within-meal parental feeding practices show cross-sectional and prospective associations with children's oral processing behaviours and whether the previously demonstrated association between faster eating rates and higher energy intakes varies by parental feeding practices. A subset (n = 155) of children and their mothers from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes cohort participated in an ad libitum meal at age 4.5 years. Children's oral processing behaviours (eating rate, bite size, chews per gram, oral exposure time, and meal duration) and parental feeding practices (autonomy-supporting and coercive prompts, restrictions, hurrying, and slowing) were recorded during the meal. Subsequently, 94 of the children participated in a follow-up meal without their mothers at age 6 years. Parental feeding practices were not consistently associated with child oral processing behaviours overall. However, exploratory post hoc analyses revealed some sex differences. The mothers of girls with faster eating rates, larger bite sizes, and fewer chews were more likely to use hurrying, slowing, and restrictions, but similar associations were not observed among boys. Children who had the most problematic eating style and were eating fast and for long experienced more restrictions, instructions to slow down, and prompts. Faster eating rates were linked with the highest energy intakes if children were additionally prompted to eat. Prospective analyses showed that children who were more often prompted using coercive techniques and less frequently hurried at age 4.5 years had faster eating rates at 6 years and a larger increase in eating rates between ages 4.5 and 6 years but did not consume more energy. Although the direction of these associations cannot be assumed, these exploratory analyses suggest sex differences in the associations between feeding practices and oral processing behaviours and highlight the potential role of parents in the development of children's oral processing behaviours.

Indexed as

ChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMasticationParentsProspective StudiesSingaporechildhood obesityeating behaviourseating rateenergy intakefeeding practicesoral processing

Identifiers

PMID30051652
PMCPMC6239158
OpenAlexW2901413275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.