Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051247›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018

Classification of Tumor Epithelium and Stroma by Exploiting Image Features Learned by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Yue Du, Roy Zhang, Abolfazl Zargari, Theresa C Thai, Camille C Gunderson, Katherine M Moxley, Hong Liu, Bin Zheng, Yuchen Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gynecological cancers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue DuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Roy ZhangDepartment of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Abolfazl ZargariSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Theresa C ThaiDepartment of Radiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Camille C GundersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Katherine M MoxleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Hong LiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Yuchen QiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. qiuyuchen@ou.edu.
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Increasing Cancer Detection Yield Using Breast MRI Screening ModalityR01CA197150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, ALAN B., LIU, HONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
National Cancer Institute R01CA197150NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197150Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology HR15-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) reflected on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histological images is a potential prognostic factor for survival. Automatic image processing techniques that allow for high-throughput and precise discrimination of tumor epithelium and stroma are required to elevate the prognostic significance of the TSR. As a variant of deep learning techniques, transfer learning leverages nature-images features learned by deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to relieve the requirement of deep CNNs for immense sample size when handling biomedical classification problems. Herein we studied different transfer learning strategies for accurately distinguishing epithelial and stromal regions of H&E-stained histological images acquired from either breast or ovarian cancer tissue. We compared the performance of important deep CNNs as either a feature extractor or as an architecture for fine-tuning with target images. Moreover, we addressed the current contradictory issue about whether the higher-level features would generalize worse than lower-level ones because they are more specific to the source-image domain. Under our experimental setting, the transfer learning approach achieved an accuracy of 90.2 (vs. 91.1 for fine tuning) with GoogLeNet, suggesting the feasibility of using it in assisting pathology-based binary classification problems. Our results also show that the superiority of the lower-level or the higher-level features over the other ones was determined by the architecture of deep CNNs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsTissue Array AnalysisCNNsDeep learningEpithelium and stromaTransfer learningTSR

Identifiers

PMID30051247
PMCPMC6286645
OpenAlexW2884034416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.