Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051239›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2019

Concept Mapping: Engaging Urban Men to Understand Community Influences on Partner Violence Perpetration.

Charvonne N Holliday, Sophie M Morse, Nathan A Irvin, Angelique Green-Manning, Lisa M Nitsch, Jessica G Burke, Jacquelyn C Campbell, Michele R Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining the Neighborhood Attributes of Recently Housed Partner Violence Survivors in Rapid Rehousing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charvonne N HollidayDepartment of Population, Family & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. cholliday@jhu.edu.
Sophie M MorseLBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nathan A IrvinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Angelique Green-ManningHouse of Ruth Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lisa M NitschHouse of Ruth Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica G BurkeDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jacquelyn C CampbellDepartment of Public Health Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michele R DeckerDepartment of Population, Family & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD012089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant health concern rooted in community experiences and other social determinants. The purpose of this study is to understand community-based risk and protective factors of IPV perpetration through participatory research that engages men who use IPV. Secondarily, we assess the relative influence, as measured by ranking, of these factors regarding risk of IPV perpetration and stress. We conducted concept mapping with Baltimore men (n = 28), ages 18 and older, enrolled in an abuse intervention program (AIP), through partnership with a domestic violence agency. Concept mapping, a three-phase participatory process, generates ideas around an issue then visually presents impactful domains via multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering. Most participants were Black (87.5%) and 20-39 years old (75%). Seven key domains, or clusters, were established. "No hope for the future" was the greatest contributor to IPV perpetration. "Socioeconomic struggles" (i.e., lack of employment) and "life in Baltimore" (i.e., homicide) were most likely to result in stress. Emergent domains related to IPV perpetration and stress were ranked similarly, but with some nuance. Having good support systems (i.e., family, community centers) were felt to prevent IPV and reduce stress. This participant-driven process among a primarily young, Black sample of Baltimore men speaks to the influence of perceived social disempowerment and underlying trauma on intimate relationships and the potential for mitigation. Few studies have engaged men who use IPV through participatory research to understand the comprehensive dynamics of an impoverished, urban environment. Results provide direction for community-based intervention and prevention programming to increase self-efficacy, particularly among younger men, and to enact trauma-informed violence prevention policy from the perspectives of male IPV perpetrators.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBaltimoreDomestic ViolenceEnvironment DesignHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSexual BehaviorUrban PopulationYoung AdultConcept mappingIntimate partner violenceMenParticipatory researchSocial determinantsUrban healthViolence perpetration

Identifiers

PMID30051239
PMCPMC6391285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.