ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018
Traditional Chinese medicine and drug-induced anaphylaxis: data from the Beijing pharmacovigilance database.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and trends of anaphylaxis among inpatients from 2003 to 2023 in Wuhan, China: A multicenter retrospective study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- Modulation of the Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) by Xenobiotic Compounds and Its Relevance to Human Diseases.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Review
- Case Report: Anaphylaxis caused by traditional Chinese medicine in a patient with pollinosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
- Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of salvianolic acid B in healthy Chinese volunteers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Potential cardiotoxicity induced by Euodiae Fructus:Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Chinese Medicine for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Pilot Study on Patient Preferences.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Overuse of intravenous infusions in China: focusing on management platform and cultural problems.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Review
- Overview of this issue: pharmacovigilance, what is new?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Kounis syndrome caused by bee sting: a case report and literature review.Cardiovascular journal of AfricaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is one of the major triggers for drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA). Objective We aimed to use the Beijing pharmacovigilance database (BPD) to analyze TCM-induced DIAs in Beijing, China. Setting Drug allergy case reports from the BPD provided by the Beijing Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring. Method Drug allergy cases from January 2004 to December 2014 were adjudicated. DIA triggered by TCMs were analyzed and compared with those triggered by non-TCM drugs by calculating the reported risk ratio (RRR). We also calculated the RRRs based on severe DIA and death outcomes. Main outcome measure TCMs implicated in DIAs were identified and compared with non-TCM drugs. Results TCMs accounted for 1651 (18.2%) of the total 9074 allergic cases, in which 84.4% (1393/1651) were triggered by injections. Of the TCM allergic cases, 8.5% (141) were DIAs and 7.3% (120) were severe DIAs, and three patients died from injections. The RRR between TCMs and non-TCM-induced DIAs was 0.63. When anaphylactic cases were compared between TCMs to the top four non-TCM drug triggers, RRRs were 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.87) for antibiotics, 0.36 (95% CI 0.29-0.44) for radiocontrast agents, 0.55 (95% CI 0.43-0.68) for chemotherapeutics, and 0.29 (95% CI 0.23-0.37) for biologics. Compared to TCM oral or topic formulations, TCM injections had higher RRRs in each of the above comparisons. Conclusion TCM was associated with a decreased risk of DIA compared to non-TCM drugs in drug allergy cases, and the risk was higher for TCM injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.