Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051151›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018

Phosphodiesterase Inhibition in the Treatment of Preeclampsia: What Is New?

Anne Brandolt Larré, Fernando Sontag, Débora Montenegro Pasin, Nathália Paludo, Rayssa Ruszkowski do Amaral, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa, Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Brandolt LarréPostgraduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences (Nephrology), Laboratory of Nephrology-School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fernando SontagPostgraduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences (Nephrology), Laboratory of Nephrology-School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Débora Montenegro PasinPostgraduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences (Nephrology), Laboratory of Nephrology-School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Nathália PaludoPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Rayssa Ruszkowski do AmaralPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da CostaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. bart@pucrs.br.
Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-FigueiredoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe present study intends to review the possibility of using phosphodiesterase inhibitors as a treatment option for preeclampsia, addressing potential risks and benefits. RECENT

findingsPreeclampsia is the most common hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, often responsible for severe maternal and fetal complications, which can lead to early pregnancy termination and death. Despite the numerous studies, its pathophysiology is still unclear, although it seems to involve a multiplicity of complex factors related to angiogenesis, ineffective vasodilation, oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and endothelial dysfunction. It has been hypothetically suggested that the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors is capable of improving placental and fetal perfusion, contributing to gestational scenario, by decreasing the symptomatology and severity of this syndrome. In this literature review, it has been found that most of the studies were conducted in animal models, and there is still lack of evidence supporting its use in clinical practice. Research in human indicates conflicting findings; randomized controlled trials were scarce and did not demonstrate any benefit in morbidity or mortality. Data regarding to pathophysiological and interventional research are described and commented in this review. The use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of preeclampsia is controversial and should not be encouraged taking into account recent data.

Indexed as

AnimalsCyclic GMPDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansNitric OxidePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPre-EclampsiaPregnancyVasodilationCyclic GMPNitric OxidePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsHypertension, pregnancy-inducedModels, animalPhosphodiesteraseSildenafil

Identifiers

PMID30051151
OpenAlexW2885003422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.