ArticleAEM education and training2018
The View From the Top: Academic Emergency Department Chairs' Perspectives on Education Scholarship.
Article in AEM education and training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding gendered experiences in academic health sciences: a grounded theory study on leadership and continuing professional development.Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Institutional Recognition of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Health Professions Education: Using Institutional Logics to Understand Inconsistencies.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Development of entrustable professional activities for emergency medicine medical education fellowships: A modified Delphi study.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Five Key Articles on Curriculum Development for Graduate Medical Educators.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Review
- The effect of the Educational Scholar Program as a longitudinal faculty development program on the capability of educators as scholars.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- A developmental pathway toward leadership for educational change: the Educators' experiences of the educational scholar program.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Is it worth it? A qualitative analysis of the impact of medical education fellowships on careers.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- A workforce study of emergency medicine medical education fellowship directors: Describing roles, responsibilities, support, and priorities.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Outcome assessment of medical education fellowships in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2021Article
- Emergency Medicine Education Research Since the 2012 Consensus Conference: How Far Have We Come and What's Next?AEM education and training · 2020Article
- The View From the Top: Academic Emergency Department Chairs' Perspectives on Education Scholarship.AEM education and training · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Education scholarship continues to grow within emergency medicine (EM) and in academic medicine in general. Despite a growing interest, would-be education scholars often struggle to find adequate mentorship, research training, funding, and protected time to produce rigorous scholarship. The ways in which individual academic EM departments can support this mission remains an area in need of description.
objectivesWe sought to describe academic EM department chairs' perceptions of education scholarship and facilitators and barriers to producing high-quality education scholarship.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using a grounded theory-derived approach. Participants were solicited directly, and semistructured interviews were conducted via telephone. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and were analyzed by three study investigators using a coding matrix. Discrepancies in coding were resolved via in depth discussion.
resultsWe interviewed seven EM chairs from academic departments throughout North America (six in geographically diverse regions of the United States and one in western Canada). Chairs described education scholarship as lacking clearly defined and measurable outcomes, as well as methodologic rigor. They identified that education faculty within their departments need training and incentives to pursue scholarly work in a system that primarily expects teaching from educators. Chairs acknowledged a lack of access to education research expertise and mentorship within their own departments, but identified potential resources within their local medical schools and universities. They also voiced willingness to support career development opportunities and scholarly work among faculty seeking to perform education research.
conclusionsAcademic EM chairs endorse a need for methodologic training, mentorship, and access to expertise specific to education scholarship. While such resources are often rare within academic EM departments, they may exist within local universities and schools of medicine. Academic EM chairs described themselves as willing and able to support faculty who wish to pursue this type of work.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.