Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30051058›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2018

Comparison of Online and Classroom-based Formats for Teaching Emergency Medicine to Medical Students in Uganda.

Swaminatha V Mahadevan, Rebecca Walker, Joseph Kalanzi, Luggya Tonny Stone, Corey Bills, Peter Acker, Jordan C Apfeld, Jennifer Newberry, Joseph Becker, Aditya Mantha and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pre-course online cases for the world health organization's basic emergency care course in Uganda: A mixed methods analysis.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Swaminatha V MahadevanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Rebecca WalkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Joseph KalanziMakerere University College of Health Sciences Kampala Uganda.
Luggya Tonny StoneMakerere University College of Health Sciences Kampala Uganda.
Corey BillsDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco CA.
Peter AckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Jordan C ApfeldDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Jennifer NewberryDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Joseph BeckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Aditya ManthaUniversity of California Irvine School of Medicine Irvine CA.
Anne N Tecklenburg StrehlowDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Matthew C StrehlowDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSevere global shortages in the health care workforce sector have made improving access to essential emergency care challenging. The paucity of trained specialists in low- and middle-income countries translates to large swathes of the population receiving inadequate care. Efforts to expand emergency medicine (EM) education are similarly impeded by a lack of available and appropriate teaching faculty. The development of comprehensive, online medical education courses offers a potentially economical, scalable, and lasting solution for universities experiencing professional shortages.

methodsAn EM course addressing core concepts and patient management was developed for medical students enrolled at Makerere University College of Health Sciences in Kampala, Uganda. Material was presented to students in two comparable formats: online video modules and traditional classroom-based lectures. Following completion of the course, students were assessed for knowledge gains.

resultsForty-two and 48 students enrolled and completed all testing in the online and classroom courses, respectively. Student knowledge gains were equivalent (classroom 25 ± 8.7% vs. online 23 ± 6.5%, p = 0.18), regardless of the method of course delivery.

conclusionsA summative evaluation of Ugandan medical students demonstrated that online teaching modules are effectively equivalent and offer a viable alternative to traditional classroom-based lectures delivered by on-site, visiting faculty in their efficacy to teach expertise in EM. Web-based curriculum can help alleviate the burden on universities in developing nations struggling with a critical shortage of health care educators while simultaneously satisfying the growing community demand for access to emergency medical care. Future studies assessing the long-term retention of course material could gauge its incorporation into clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID30051058
PMCPMC6001592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.