ArticleAEM education and training2017
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.
Article in AEM education and training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveling the field: Development of reliable scoring rubrics for quantitative and qualitative medical education research abstracts.AEM education and training · 2021Article
- Article
- Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.AEM education and training · 2017Article
- Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2019.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMArticle
- Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2020.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMReview
- Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2021.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objectives were to critically appraise the medical education research literature of 2015 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative examples.
methodsA total of 434 emergency medicine (EM)-related articles were discovered upon a search of ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMED, and SCOPUS. These were both quantitative and qualitative in nature. All were screened by two of the authors using previously published exclusion criteria, and the remaining were appraised by all authors using a previously published scoring system. The highest scoring articles were then reviewed.
resultsSixty-one manuscripts were scored, and 10 quantitative and two qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are reviewed and summarized in this article.
conclusionsThis installment in this critical appraisal series reviews 12 of the highest-quality EM-related medical education research manuscripts published in 2015.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.