ArticleAEM education and training2017
Multiple Wins: Embracing Technology to Increase Efficiency and Maximize Efforts.
Article in AEM education and training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translate Your Education Work Into Scholarship: A 5-Step Approach.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Reconceptualizing the emergency medicine resident scholarly requirement: Proposed framework and rubric.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- Educator's blueprint: A guide for clinician-educators to achieve promotion in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- Program evaluation: An educator's portal into academic scholarship.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Demonstrating Your Work: A Guide to Educators' Portfolios for Graduate Medical Educators.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- Remote e-Work and Distance Learning for Academic Medicine: Best Practices and Opportunities for the Future.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020Article
- Finding Your People in the Digital Age: Virtual Communities of Practice to Promote Education Scholarship.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Review
- Getting Published in Medical Education: Overcoming Barriers to Scholarly Production.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Social Media in Hematology in 2017: Dystopia, Utopia, or Somewhere In-between?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinician educators (CEs) are challenged to produce meaningful scholarship while balancing various clinical and administrative roles. The increasing availability of technology provides new opportunities for scholarly output and dissemination. This article proposes three strategies for utilizing technology to enhance scholarly output for the busy CE. The strategies are supported by real examples of these techniques, followed by a discussion of potential limitations and future directions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.