ReviewPractical laboratory medicine2018
Uncertainty in measurement: A review of the procedures for determining uncertainty in measurement and its use in deriving the biological variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Review in Practical laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Glomerular Filtration Rate in Former Extreme Low Birth Weight Infants over the Full Pediatric Age Range: A Pooled Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Association between cholecystectomy and chronic kidney disease risk: a nationally retrospective cohort study.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Microbial contamination of diesel-biodiesel blends in storage tank; an analysis of colony morphology.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Statistical distributions commonly used in measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine.Biochemia medica · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Procedures for assessing the uncertainty in measurement and estimates of biological variation are currently available for many measurands capable of direct analytical measurement. However, not all measurands or quantity values determined in a medical laboratory are provided by direct analytical measurement. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is such a quantity value. In this situation, the result is calculated from other measurements through a functional relationship in which the output value (the calculated quantity value) is derived from one or more input quantities by applying a defined mathematical equation. The aims of this review are: to summarise the principal methods for assessing uncertainty in measurement in complicated non-linear expressions; and to describe an approach for estimating the uncertainty in measurement and biological variation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations for eGFR. In practice, either the direct application of the propagation of uncertainty in measurement equation or a Monte Carlo simulation procedure using a readily available spreadsheet may be used to evaluate uncertainty in measurement or the propagation of biological variation. If the only recognised "uncertainty" is the biological variation in the measured serum creatinine, the equation for the propagation of uncertainties in measurement for the eGFR simplifies to an expression in which the coefficient of variation of the eGFR (or the biological variation of the eGFR) is directly proportional to the coefficient of variation of the measured serum creatinine (or the biological variation of the serum creatinine).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.