Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050689›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2018

From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome.

Joaquín Fernández, Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo, Javier Martínez, Ana Tauste, David P Piñero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect of aberrometry in diagnosis of isolated spherophakia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  16. Posterior capsular opacification evaluation through contrast sensitivity defocus curves with two multifocal intraocular lenses of similar material.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joaquín FernándezDepartment of Ophthalmology (Qvision), Vithas Virgen del Mar Hospital, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Manuel Rodríguez-VallejoDepartment of Ophthalmology (Qvision), Vithas Virgen del Mar Hospital, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5466-875X
Javier MartínezDepartment of Ophthalmology (Qvision), Vithas Virgen del Mar Hospital, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Ana TausteDepartment of Ophthalmology (Qvision), Vithas Virgen del Mar Hospital, 04120 Almería, Spain.
David P PiñeroDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1546-4807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysfunctional lens syndrome (DLS) is a term coined to describe the natural aging changes in the crystalline lens. Different alterations in the refractive properties and transparency of the lens are produced during the development of presbyopia and cataract, such as changes in internal high order aberrations or an increase in ocular forward scattering, with a potentially significant impact on clinical measures, including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Objective technologies have emerged to solve the limits of current methods for the grading of the lens aging, which have been linked to the DLS term. However, there is still not a gold standard or evidence-based clinical guidelines around these new technologies despite multiple research studies have correlated their results with conventional methods such as visual acuity or the lens opacification system (LOCS), with more scientific background around the ocular scattering index (OSI) and Scheimpflug densitometry. In either case, DLS is not a new evidence-based concept that leads to new knowledge about crystalline lens aging but it is a nomenclature change of two existing terms, presbyopia and cataracts. Therefore, this term should be used with caution in the scientific peer-reviewed literature.

Identifiers

PMID30050689
PMCPMC6040261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.