Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050640›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2018

Determinants and outcomes associated with decisions to deny intensive care unit admission in Tunisian ICU.

Rania Bouneb, Menel Mellouli, Maha Dardouri, Houda Ben Soltane, Imed Chouchene, Mohamed Boussarsar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rania BounebDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Farhat Hached, Susah Tunisia.
Menel MellouliDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Susah Tunisia.
Maha DardouriDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Susah Tunisia.
Houda Ben SoltaneDepartment of emergency, University Hospital of Farhat Hached, Susah Tunisia.
Imed ChoucheneDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Farhat Hached, Susah Tunisia.
Mohamed BoussarsarDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Farhat Hached, Susah Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionintensive care unit (ICU) beds are a scarce resource, and admissions may require prioritization when demand exceeds supply. However, there are few data regarding both outcomes of admitted patients to intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison with outcomes of not admitted patients. The aim of this study was to assess reasons and factors associated to refusal of admission to ICU as well as the impact on mortality at 28 days and patients' outcomes.

methodsSingle-center, cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in 8-bed Medical ICU at a Tunisian University hospital. All consecutive adult patients referred for admission to ICU during 6 months were included. We collected demographic data, ICU admission/refusal reasons, co-morbidity and diagnosis at time of admission, mortality probability model (MPMII0) score, day and time of admission, request for admission and mortality at 28 days.

results327 patients were evaluated for ICU admission and 260 were refused to ICU (79.5%). Patients refused because of unavailability of beds represented 50% and patients considered "too sick to benefit" represented 22%. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of acute respiratory failure and request by direct contact in the unit were independently associated to admission to ICU (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07-0.31 and OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.08-0.31, respectively). Higher mortality rates were shown in patients "too sick to benefit" (80.7%) and unavailable beds (26.56%).

conclusionRefusal of ICU admission was correlated with the severity of acute illness, lack of ICU beds and reasons for admission request. ICU clinicians should evaluate their triage decisions and, if possible, routinely solicit patient preferences during medical emergencies, taking steps to ensure that ICU admission decisions are in line with the goals of the patient. Ultimately, these efforts will help ensure that scarce ICU resources are used most effectively and efficiently.

Indexed as

Decision MakingTriageAdultAgedBed OccupancyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient AdmissionIntensive care unitmortalityrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30050640
PMCPMC6057582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.