Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Does the Clock Tick Slower or Faster in Parkinson's Disease? - Insights Gained From the Synchronized Tapping Task.

Shin-Ichi Tokushige, Yasuo Terao, Shunichi Matsuda, Toshiaki Furubayashi, Takuya Sasaki, Satomi Inomata-Terada, Akihiro Yugeta, Masashi Hamada, Shoji Tsuji, Yoshikazu Ugawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Time Distortion in Parkinsonism.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shin-Ichi TokushigeDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo TeraoDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunichi MatsudaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki FurubayashiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Science and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan.
Takuya SasakiDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Satomi Inomata-TeradaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro YugetaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi HamadaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji TsujiDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu UgawaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPFukushima Medical University · JPTohoku Bunka Gakuen University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhythm of the internal clock is considered to be determined by the basal ganglia, with some studies suggesting slower internal clock in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, patients may also show motor hastening when they walk (festination) or are engaged in repetitive tapping, indicating faster ticking of the internal clock. Is the internal clock slower or faster in PD? The purpose of this study was to answer this question, i.e., how fast and slow a rhythm they can synchronize with, especially with reference to the limit of sensorimotor synchronization or temporal integration, representing the threshold of slower pace they can entrain into their motor actions, which is known to lie between 2 and 3 s in normal subjects but not yet studied in PD. We employed a synchronized tapping task that required subjects to tap the key in synchrony with repetitive tones at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISI) between 200 and 4800 ms. Twenty normal subjects and sixteen PD patients were enrolled, who were classified into early and advanced PD groups by UPDRS-III (early: 15 or less, advanced: more than 15). The ISI at which the response changes from synchronizing with the tones to lagging behind them was considered to be the limit of temporal integration. Early PD patients responded ahead of the tones (negative asynchrony), which became more apparent with repeated tapping. This suggested "faster" ticking clock even in the presence of the pacing tones. In normal subjects, the limit of temporal integration was around 2-3 s: below this, subjects could synchronize with the tones, while above it they had difficulty in synchronization. In early PD patients, the limit of temporal integration was significantly longer than in normal subjects, pointing to their enhanced ability to synchronize also with slower paces of tones, but advanced PD patients had significantly shortened limits, suggesting that advanced patients lost this ability. In conclusion, the limit of temporal integration is initially longer but gets shorter as the disease progresses. It can be explained by the hastening of the internal clock at the earlier stages of PD, followed by the loss of temporal integration.

Indexed as

basal gangliainternal clockParkinson’s diseasesynchronized tappingtemporal integration

Identifiers

PMID30050482
PMCPMC6051396
OpenAlexW2841459194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.