ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Does the Clock Tick Slower or Faster in Parkinson's Disease? - Insights Gained From the Synchronized Tapping Task.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal synchronization during bilateral foot-tapping and its relationship with gait disturbance in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- EEG neural indicator of temporal integration in the human auditory brain with clinical implications.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Temporal merging into pitch with click train in the macaque auditory cortex.National science review · 2025Article
- Amplifying walking activity in Parkinson's disease through autonomous music-based rhythmic auditory stimulation: randomized controlled trial.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Hierarchical Temporal Processing in the Primate Thalamocortical System: Insights from Nonlinguistic Structured Stimuli.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- A new function of offset response in the primate auditory cortex: marker of temporal integration.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Neural signals regulating motor synchronization in the primate deep cerebellar nuclei.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Within-subject variation in the cognitive timed up and go test as an explanatory variable in fall risk in patients with parkinson's disease.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Time Distortion in Parkinsonism.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Program of Seven 45-min Dry Immersion Sessions Improves Choice Reaction Time in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Temporal Generalization of Synchronized Saccades Beyond the Trained Range in Monkeys.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rhythm of the internal clock is considered to be determined by the basal ganglia, with some studies suggesting slower internal clock in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, patients may also show motor hastening when they walk (festination) or are engaged in repetitive tapping, indicating faster ticking of the internal clock. Is the internal clock slower or faster in PD? The purpose of this study was to answer this question, i.e., how fast and slow a rhythm they can synchronize with, especially with reference to the limit of sensorimotor synchronization or temporal integration, representing the threshold of slower pace they can entrain into their motor actions, which is known to lie between 2 and 3 s in normal subjects but not yet studied in PD. We employed a synchronized tapping task that required subjects to tap the key in synchrony with repetitive tones at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISI) between 200 and 4800 ms. Twenty normal subjects and sixteen PD patients were enrolled, who were classified into early and advanced PD groups by UPDRS-III (early: 15 or less, advanced: more than 15). The ISI at which the response changes from synchronizing with the tones to lagging behind them was considered to be the limit of temporal integration. Early PD patients responded ahead of the tones (negative asynchrony), which became more apparent with repeated tapping. This suggested "faster" ticking clock even in the presence of the pacing tones. In normal subjects, the limit of temporal integration was around 2-3 s: below this, subjects could synchronize with the tones, while above it they had difficulty in synchronization. In early PD patients, the limit of temporal integration was significantly longer than in normal subjects, pointing to their enhanced ability to synchronize also with slower paces of tones, but advanced PD patients had significantly shortened limits, suggesting that advanced patients lost this ability. In conclusion, the limit of temporal integration is initially longer but gets shorter as the disease progresses. It can be explained by the hastening of the internal clock at the earlier stages of PD, followed by the loss of temporal integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.