Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050446›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Enabling Detailed, Biophysics-Based Skeletal Muscle Models on HPC Systems.

Chris P Bradley, Nehzat Emamy, Thomas Ertl, Dominik Göddeke, Andreas Hessenthaler, Thomas Klotz, Aaron Krämer, Michael Krone, Benjamin Maier, Miriam Mehl and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chris P BradleyAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nehzat EmamyInstitute for Parallel and Distributed Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas ErtlStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Dominik GöddekeStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Andreas HessenthalerStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas KlotzStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Aaron KrämerStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Michael KroneStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Benjamin MaierInstitute for Parallel and Distributed Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Miriam MehlInstitute for Parallel and Distributed Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Tobias RauStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Oliver RöhrleStuttgart Centre for Simulation Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Realistic simulations of detailed, biophysics-based, multi-scale models often require very high resolution and, thus, large-scale compute facilities. Existing simulation environments, especially for biomedical applications, are typically designed to allow for high flexibility and generality in model development. Flexibility and model development, however, are often a limiting factor for large-scale simulations. Therefore, new models are typically tested and run on small-scale compute facilities. By using a detailed biophysics-based, chemo-electromechanical skeletal muscle model and the international open-source software library OpenCMISS as an example, we present an approach to upgrade an existing muscle simulation framework from a moderately parallel version toward a massively parallel one that scales both in terms of problem size and in terms of the number of parallel processes. For this purpose, we investigate different modeling, algorithmic and implementational aspects. We present improvements addressing both numerical and parallel scalability. In addition, our approach includes a novel visualization environment which is based on the MegaMol framework and is capable of handling large amounts of simulated data. We present the results of a number of scaling studies at the Tier-1 supercomputer HazelHen at the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS). We improve the overall runtime by a factor of up to 2.6 and achieve good scalability on up to 768 cores.

Indexed as

biophysical modelinghigh-performance computingmulti-scale modelingnumerical efficiencyscalabilityskeletal muscle mechanicsvisualization

Identifiers

PMID30050446
PMCPMC6052132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.