Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050414›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2018

The Roles of Rods, Cones, and Melanopsin in Photoresponses of M4 Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs) and Optokinetic Visual Behavior.

Melanie M Schroeder, Krystal R Harrison, Elizabeth R Jaeckel, Hunter N Berger, Xiwu Zhao, Michael P Flannery, Emma C St Pierre, Nancy Pateqi, Agnieszka Jachimska, Andrew P Chervenak and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie M SchroederDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Krystal R HarrisonDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Elizabeth R JaeckelDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Hunter N BergerDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Xiwu ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Michael P FlanneryDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Emma C St PierreDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Nancy PateqiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Agnieszka JachimskaDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Andrew P ChervenakDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Kwoon Y WongDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

VIVARIUM MODULEP30EY007003 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Antonetti · 1987 to 2026
$17.6M
Retrograde Signaling by Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion CellsR01EY023660 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WONG, KWOON Y. · 2013 to 2020
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007003NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate not only image-forming vision like other ganglion cells, but also non-image-forming physiological responses to light such as pupil constriction and circadian photoentrainment. All ipRGCs respond to light through their endogenous photopigment melanopsin as well as rod/cone-driven synaptic inputs. A major knowledge gap is how melanopsin, rods, and cones differentially drive ipRGC photoresponses and image-forming vision. We whole-cell-recorded from M4-type ipRGCs lacking melanopsin, rod input, or cone input to dissect the roles of each component in ipRGCs' responses to steady and temporally modulated (≥0.3 Hz) lights. We also used a behavioral assay to determine how the elimination of melanopsin, rod, or cone function impacts the optokinetic visual behavior of mice. Results showed that the initial, transient peak in an M4 cell's responses to 10-s light steps arises from rod and cone inputs. Both the sustainability and poststimulus persistence of these light-step responses depend only on rod and/or cone inputs, which is unexpected because these ipRGC photoresponse properties have often been attributed primarily to melanopsin. For temporally varying stimuli, the enhancement of response sustainedness involves melanopsin, whereas stimulus tracking is mediated by rod and cone inputs. Finally, the behavioral assay showed that while all three photoreceptive systems are nearly equally important for contrast sensitivity, only cones and rods contribute to spatial acuity.

Indexed as

coneintrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC)melanopsinphotoreceptorretinarodvisionvisual behavior

Identifiers

PMID30050414
PMCPMC6052130
OpenAlexW2868408808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.