Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050391›Full record

ReviewOccupational therapy international2018

Enhancing a Client-Centred Practice with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

A Enemark Larsen, B Rasmussen, J R Christensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Occupational therapy international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Case Reports in the Integration of Technology with Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Memory Concerns and Their Care Partners.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Occupational performance in Huntington's disease: A cross-sectional study.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Enemark LarsenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Institute of Medwifery and Therapy, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, DK-2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-4156
B RasmussenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Institute of Medwifery and Therapy, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, DK-2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.
J R ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløwsvej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe active participation of clients is an important aspect of rehabilitation quality as conceptualized in client-centred practice (CCP). A recommended outcome measure for enhancing CCP is the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). However, the relationship between COPM use and CCP enhancement has not been documented.

aimThe aim of this study was to examine whether the use of the COPM enhanced CCP.

methodsWe performed a scoping review in five steps: (1)

resultsTwelve studies were included in the review. The results indicated enhanced CCP in two themes when using the COPM. These themes appeared to influence each other; therefore, the first theme,

conclusionThe use of the COPM seems to enhance CCP if certain conditions are present.

Indexed as

CanadaEmployee Performance AppraisalEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleOccupational TherapyOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID30050391
PMCPMC6040242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.