Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050323›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Diagnostic and prognostic value of microRNAs in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chao Sun, Jie Zhu, Bin Wu, Jianlei Chen, Zhenwei Zhu, Peng Cai, Wanliang Guo, Zhicheng Gu, Jian Wang, Shungen Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circulating microRNAs Expression as Prognosis Biomarker of Cholangiocarcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  7. Overview of miR-106a Regulatory Roles: from Cancer to Aging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Role of microRNAs in Cholangiocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chao SunGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Jie ZhuGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Bin WuGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Jianlei ChenGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Zhenwei ZhuGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Peng CaiGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Wanliang GuoRadiology Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China.
Zhicheng GuGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Jian WangGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Shungen HuangGeneral Surgery Department, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215003, People's Republic of China, drhuang01@163.com.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimSeveral dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA); however, small sample sizes and invariable research designs are limitations, hindering a thorough analysis of miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic tools for CCA. This study aimed to systematically summarize the clinical value of miRNAs in human CCA both for all available miRNAs and single miRNA with multiple researches.

methodsPooled parameters included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and hazard ratios (HRs) to separately determine overall diagnostic and prognostic performance. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed only in the event of heterogeneity. Thirty-four studies including 12 diagnostic studies and 22 prognostic studies were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis.

resultsWe observed that miR-21, miR-26, miR-483, miR-106a, miR-150, miR-192, and miR-194 were employed for distinguishing patients with CCA from healthy controls. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.86), 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.89), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), respectively. Abnormal expression of miR-21, miR-26a, miR-192, miR-200c, miR-221, miR-29a, miR-191, miR-181c, miR-34a, miR-106a, miR-203, and miR-373 in patients was confirmed to associate with poor survival rate. Pooled HRs and 95% CIs were calculated using STATA, resulting in the pooled HR of 1.47 (95% CI 0.91-2.37) for overall survival (OS), 0.67 (95% CI 0.16-2.81) for disease-free survival (DFS), 2.31 (95% CI 1.59-3.36) for progression-free survival (PFS), and 2.68 (95% CI 0.88-8.15) for relapse-free survival (RFS). Thus, CCA patients with dysregulated miRNA expression were confirmed to have shorter OS, DFS, PFS, and RFS. Data regarding the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miR-21 suggested pooled diagnostic results of miR-21 for sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.91), 0.92 (95% CI 0.81-0.97), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95), respectively, suggesting better diagnostic performance of miR-21 compared with other miRNAs. Meanwhile, pooled prognostic result of miR-21 for HR was 1.88 (95% CI 1.41-2.51), indicating miR-21 could more appropriately predict shorter OS in patients with CCA.

conclusionmiRNAs may provide a new approach for clinical application, and miR-21 may be a promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of CCA.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomadiagnosismeta-analysismicroRNAsmiR-21prognosis

Identifiers

PMID30050323
PMCPMC6055881
OpenAlexW2884514755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.