Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050156›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2018

A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes.

Shlomo Melmed, Marcello D Bronstein, Philippe Chanson, Anne Klibanski, Felipe F Casanueva, John A H Wass, Christian J Strasburger, Anton Luger, David R Clemmons, Andrea Giustina

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Myocardial Mechanics in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Echocardiographic Studies.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shlomo MelmedDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. melmed@csmc.edu.
Marcello D BronsteinDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Philippe ChansonAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Anne KlibanskiDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Felipe F CasanuevaDepartment of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
John A H WassDepartment of Endocrinology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Christian J StrasburgerDepartment of Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Anton LugerDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David R ClemmonsDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Andrea GiustinaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, San Raffaele University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 11th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in April 2017 was convened to update recommendations on therapeutic outcomes for patients with acromegaly. Consensus guidelines on the medical management of acromegaly were last published in 2014; since then, new pharmacological agents have been developed and new approaches to treatment sequencing have been considered. Thirty-seven experts in the management of patients with acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in drug approvals, clinical practice standards and clinical opinion. They considered current treatment outcome goals with a focus on the impact of current and emerging somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists and dopamine agonists on biochemical, clinical, tumour mass and surgical outcomes. The participants discussed factors that would determine pharmacological choices as well as the proposed place of each agent in the guidelines. We present consensus recommendations highlighting how acromegaly management could be optimized in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAcromegalyConsensusFemaleHuman Growth HormoneHumansMalePrognosisRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSomatostatinTreatment OutcomeHuman Growth HormonepasireotideSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID30050156
PMCPMC7136157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.