Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30050050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

SVM-SulfoSite: A support vector machine based predictor for sulfenylation sites.

Hussam J Al-Barakati, Evan W McConnell, Leslie M Hicks, Leslie B Poole, Robert H Newman, Dukka B Kc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hussam J Al-BarakatiDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA.
Evan W McConnellDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Leslie M HicksDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Leslie B PooleDepartment of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Robert H NewmanDepartment of Biology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA.
Dukka B KcDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA. dbkc@ncat.edu.

Funding

New Reagents for Tracking Protein Oxidation in Cells by MS and Imaging MethodsR33CA177461 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FURDUI, CRISTINA MARIA, POOLE, LESLIE B · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
Global Analysis of Redox Modification on Protein Kinase FunctionSC2GM113784 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA AGRI & TECH ST UNIV · PI NEWMAN, ROBERT HOWARD · 2015 to 2017
$346k
National Science Foundation (NSF) 1564606NCI NIH HHS R33 CA177461NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM113784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein S-sulfenylation, which results from oxidation of free thiols on cysteine residues, has recently emerged as an important post-translational modification that regulates the structure and function of proteins involved in a variety of physiological and pathological processes. By altering the size and physiochemical properties of modified cysteine residues, sulfenylation can impact the cellular function of proteins in several different ways. Thus, the ability to rapidly and accurately identify putative sulfenylation sites in proteins will provide important insights into redox-dependent regulation of protein function in a variety of cellular contexts. Though bottom-up proteomic approaches, such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), provide a wealth of information about global changes in the sulfenylation state of proteins, MS/MS-based experiments are often labor-intensive, costly and technically challenging. Therefore, to complement existing proteomic approaches, researchers have developed a series of computational tools to identify putative sulfenylation sites on proteins. However, existing methods often suffer from low accuracy, specificity, and/or sensitivity. In this study, we developed SVM-SulfoSite, a novel sulfenylation prediction tool that uses support vector machines (SVM) to identify key determinants of sulfenylation among five feature classes: binary code, physiochemical properties, k-space amino acid pairs, amino acid composition and high-quality physiochemical indices. Using 10-fold cross-validation, SVM-SulfoSite achieved 95% sensitivity and 83% specificity, with an overall accuracy of 89% and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.79. Likewise, using an independent test set of experimentally identified sulfenylation sites, our method achieved scores of 74%, 62%, 80% and 0.42 for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and MCC, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.81. Moreover, in side-by-side comparisons, SVM-SulfoSite performed as well as or better than existing sulfenylation prediction tools. Together, these results suggest that our method represents a robust and complementary technique for advanced exploration of protein S-sulfenylation.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalSupport Vector MachineComputational BiologyCysteineOxidation-ReductionProteinsROC CurveSulfhydryl CompoundsCysteineProteinsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID30050050
PMCPMC6062547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.