Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30049820›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2018

Outstanding questions in developmental ERK signaling.

Aleena L Patel, Stanislav Y Shvartsman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Waves in Embryonic Development.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. ERK signaling dissolves ERF repression condensates in living embryos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleena L PatelLewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Stanislav Y ShvartsmanLewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA stas@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9152-9334

Funding

Systems biology of MAPK signaling in early drosophila embryoR01GM086537 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BURDINE, REBECCA D., GOLDSMITH, ELIZABETH J. · 2011 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway leads to activation of the effector molecule ERK, which controls downstream responses by phosphorylating a variety of substrates, including transcription factors. Crucial insights into the regulation and function of this pathway came from studying embryos in which specific phenotypes arise from aberrant ERK activation. Despite decades of research, several important questions remain to be addressed for deeper understanding of this highly conserved signaling system and its function. Answering these questions will require quantifying the first steps of pathway activation, elucidating the mechanisms of transcriptional interpretation and measuring the quantitative limits of ERK signaling within which the system must operate to avoid developmental defects.

Indexed as

MAP Kinase Signaling SystemAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticInductive ERK signalingQuantitative parametersRegulatory networksTranscriptional interpretation

Identifiers

PMID30049820
PMCPMC6078328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.