Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30049729›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2019

Nebulised surfactant to reduce severity of respiratory distress: a blinded, parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Stefan Minocchieri, Clare A Berry, J Jane Pillow, CureNeb Study Team

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04315636 (Surfactant Nebulization for the Early Aeration of the Preterm Lung), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04315636 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Surfactant Nebulization for the Early Aeration of the Preterm Lung: a Single Blinded, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2021 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsPreterm Birth, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome NeonatalArmsSurfactant nebulisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Response to aerosolized calfactant in infants with respiratory distress syndrome; a post-hoc analysis of AERO-02 trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Trial
  6. Nasal high-flow therapy to Optimise Stability during Intubation: the NOSI pilot trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2023
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Prophylactic surfactant therapy in the era of less invasive surfactant delivery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Less invasive surfactant administration methods: Who, what and how.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Nebuliser therapy in critical care: The past, present and future.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024
    Review
  15. Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Viewpoint.American journal of perinatology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan MinocchieriCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Clare A BerryCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
J Jane PillowCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
CureNeb Study Team
University of Western Australia · AUKantonsspital Winterthur · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate if nebulised surfactant reduces intubation requirement in preterm infants with respiratory distress treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

designDouble blind, parallel, stratified, randomised control trial.

settingSole tertiary neonatal unit in West Australia. PATIENTS: Preterm infants (29

interventionsInfants were randomised within strata (29

main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were requirement for intubation and duration of mechanical ventilation at 72 hours. Data analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle.

results360 of 606 assessed infants were eligible; 64 of 360 infants were enrolled and randomised (n=32/group). Surfactant nebulisation reduced the requirement for intubation within 72 hours: 11 of 32 infants were intubated after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nebulised surfactant compared with 22 of 32 infants receiving CPAP alone (relative risk (95% CI)=0.526 (0.292 to 0.950)). The reduced requirement for intubation was limited to the 32

conclusionsEarly postnatal nebulised surfactant may reduce the need for intubation in the first 3 days of life compared with nCPAP alone in infants born at 29 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610000857000.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntubation, IntratrachealMaleNebulizers and VaporizersPulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornTreatment OutcomePulmonary Surfactantsinfant, prematurenebulizationrespiratory distress syndromesurfactant

Identifiers

PMID30049729
PMCPMC6764249
OpenAlexW2884059194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.