Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30049483›Full record

ArticleSurgery2018

Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A validation of current sepsis scores.

Jinhui Yan, William F Hill, Sarah Rehou, Ruxandra Pinto, Shahriar Shahrokhi, Marc G Jeschke

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07223684 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Surgical Critical Care Initiative (SC2i) Tissue and Data Acquisition Protocol (TDAP) in Burn Patients Improving the Robustness and Generalizability of Post-Burn Sepsis Prediction With the Post-Burn Sepsis Digital Twin

TypeobservationalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsSepsis, Burn Injury, Wound Healing, Critical IllnessArmsObservational Cohort (No Intervention)
NCT07249762 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Surgical Critical Care Initiative (SC2i) Tissue and Data Acquisition Protocol (TDAP) in Burn Patients Improving the Robustness and Generalizability of Post-burn Sepsis Prediction With the Post-Burn Sepsis Digital Twin. Group 1

TypeobservationalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsSepsis, Burn Injury, Wound Healing, Critical IllnessArmsObservational Cohort (No Intervention)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Scoping Review of Fluorescence Imaging: A Promising New Technology for Bacterial Detection in Burn Wounds.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.Military Medical Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Discussion on classification and diagnostic nomenclature of burn infection].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinhui YanSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
William F HillSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah RehouSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruxandra PintoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shahriar ShahrokhiRoss Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marc G JeschkeSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: marc.jeschke@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

Hepatic ER stress contributes to morbidity and mortality after burn injury.R01GM087285 · NIGMS · SUNNYBROOK & WOMEN'S COLL HLTH SCIS CTR · PI BOEHNING, DARREN F, JESCHKE, MARC GERHARD · 2010 to 2018
$1.9M
CIHR 123336CIHR CMA151725NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains an ongoing diagnostic challenge in burns, especially with the signs of sepsis being ubiquitously present during the acute period after injury. We aimed to determine the predictive validity of 3 current sepsis criteria in the burn population. The criteria of interest included the American Burn Association sepsis criteria, Mann-Salinas et al predictors of sepsis, and the Sepsis-3 consensus definition.

methodsAdult patients with an acute burn injury who were diagnosed prospectively with sepsis by the burn team using specific clinical markers were included in this cohort study. Sepsis predictors were collected from patient charts and used to calculate the results of the 3 criteria, then subsequently compared to the clinical diagnosis.

resultsOf the 418 patients in the study, which took place from 2000 until 2016, 88 (21%) were septic; the mean age was 50 ± 18 years with a mean percent total body surface area burn of 30% ± 17%. Inhalation injury was present in 50%, median length of stay was 49 (29-71) days, and mortality was 19%. The American Burn Association, Mann-Salinas, and Sepsis-3 criteria were positive in 59%, 28%, and 85% respectively, P < .05. The most reliable predictors included increased oxygen requirements, altered mental status, hypothermia, hyperthermia, tachycardia, and hypotension.

conclusionThe Sepsis-3 criteria was the most predictive, followed by the American Burn Association and Mann-Salinas criteria. However, no criterion alone had the accuracy to be a diagnostic standard within this burn population. We recommend sepsis is clinically assessed, diagnosed, and documented prospectively by the burn team, and not by the application of retrospective criteria.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBurnsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSepsisSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30049483
PMCPMC6311995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.