Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Assessment of Both Structure and Function.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. The prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on imaging modality and sex difference.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
   Pooled it
2. Diagnostic Advancements in MINOCA: Do They Translate to a Better Clinical Outcome? A Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
   Review
3. Exploring coronary microvascular dysfunction from functional impairment and structural damage.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
   Review
4. Do Statins Have a Positive Impact on Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction on Long-Term Clinical Outcome? A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.BioMed research international · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.2018

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as