Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30049275›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2018

Using Google Location History data to quantify fine-scale human mobility.

Nick Warren Ruktanonchai, Corrine Warren Ruktanonchai, Jessica Rhona Floyd, Andrew J Tatem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in small area population estimation in the absence of national census data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nick Warren RuktanonchaiWorldPop Project, Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. nrukt00@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-7121
Corrine Warren RuktanonchaiWorldPop Project, Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Jessica Rhona FloydWorldPop Project, Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Andrew J TatemWorldPop Project, Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 1032350Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1106427Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1134076Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1170969Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1182408Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106866/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 204613/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman mobility is fundamental to understanding global issues in the health and social sciences such as disease spread and displacements from disasters and conflicts. Detailed mobility data across spatial and temporal scales are difficult to collect, however, with movements varying from short, repeated movements to work or school, to rare migratory movements across national borders. While typical sources of mobility data such as travel history surveys and GPS tracker data can inform different typologies of movement, almost no source of readily obtainable data can address all types of movement at once.

methodsHere, we collect Google Location History (GLH) data and examine it as a novel source of information that could link fine scale mobility with rare, long distance and international trips, as it uniquely spans large temporal scales with high spatial granularity. These data are passively collected by Android smartphones, which reach increasingly broad audiences, becoming the most common operating system for accessing the Internet worldwide in 2017. We validate GLH data against GPS tracker data collected from Android users in the United Kingdom to assess the feasibility of using GLH data to inform human movement.

resultsWe find that GLH data span very long temporal periods (over a year on average in our sample), are spatially equivalent to GPS tracker data within 100 m, and capture more international movement than survey data. We also find GLH data avoid compliance concerns seen with GPS trackers and bias in self-reported travel, as GLH is passively collected. We discuss some settings where GLH data could provide novel insights, including infrastructure planning, infectious disease control, and response to catastrophic events, and discuss advantages and disadvantages of using GLH data to inform human mobility patterns.

conclusionsGLH data are a greatly underutilized and novel dataset for understanding human movement. While biases exist in populations with GLH data, Android phones are becoming the first and only device purchased to access the Internet and various web services in many middle and lower income settings, making these data increasingly appropriate for a wide range of scientific questions.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneGeographic Information SystemsGeographic MappingTravelData CollectionHumansGPS tracker dataHuman mobilityMobile phone data

Identifiers

PMID30049275
PMCPMC6062973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.