ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2018
Validation of parametric mesh generation for subject-specific cerebroarterial trees using modified Hausdorff distance metrics.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebrovascular Imaging-to-Graph Reconstruction for Individualized Digital Twin Brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Machine learning segmentation of core and penumbra from acute stroke CT perfusion data.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Metaball skinning of synthetic astroglial morphologies into realistic mesh models for visual analytics and in silico simulations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Organ Contouring for Lung Cancer Patients with a Seed Generation Scheme and Random Walks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- An efficient full space-time discretization method for subject-specific hemodynamic simulations of cerebral arterial blood flow with distensible wall mechanics.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- Cerebral arteriovenous malformation venous stenosis is associated with hemodynamic changes at the draining vein-venous sinus junction.Medical hypotheses · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate subject-specific vascular network reconstruction is a critical task for the hemodynamic analysis of cerebroarterial circulation. Vascular skeletonization and computational mesh generation for large sections of cerebrovascular trees from magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an error-prone, operator-dependent, and very time-consuming task. Validation of reconstructed computational models is essential to ascertain their accuracy and precision, which directly relates to the confidence of CFD computations performed on these meshes. The aim of this study is to generate an imaging segmentation pipeline to validate and quantify the spatial accuracy of computational models of subject-specific cerebral arterial trees. We used a recently introduced parametric structured mesh (PSM) generation method to automatically reconstruct six subject-specific cerebral arterial trees containing 1364 vessels and 571 bifurcations. By automatically extracting sampling frames for all vascular segments and bifurcations, we quantify the spatial accuracy of PSM against the original MRA images. Our comprehensive study correlates lumen area, pixel-based statistical analysis, area overlap and centerline accuracy measurements. In addition, we propose a new metric, the pointwise offset surface distance metric (PSD), to quantify the spatial alignment between dimensions of reconstructed arteries and bifurcations with in-vivo data with the ability to quantify the over- and under-approximation of the reconstructed models. Accurate reconstruction of vascular trees can a practical process tool for morphological analysis of large patient data banks, such as medical record files in hospitals, or subject-specific hemodynamic simulations of the cerebral arterial circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.