Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048750›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Estimating dynamic brain functional networks using multi-subject fMRI data.

Suprateek Kundu, Jin Ming, Jordan Pierce, Jennifer McDowell, Ying Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Generalized Connectivity Matrix Response Regression with Applications in Brain Connectivity Studies.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Brain functional network reconstruction based on compressed sensing and fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suprateek KunduDepartment of Biostatistics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: suprateek.kundu@emory.edu.
Jin MingDepartment of Biostatistics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Jordan PierceDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, 125 Baldwin Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jennifer McDowellDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, 125 Baldwin Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Ying GuoDepartment of Biostatistics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Method Development of Agreement Measures and Applications in Mental HealthR01MH079448 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2008 to 2016
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079448NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common assumption in the study of brain functional connectivity is that the brain network is stationary. However it is increasingly recognized that the brain organization is prone to variations across the scanning session, fueling the need for dynamic connectivity approaches. One of the main challenges in developing such approaches is that the frequency and change points for the brain organization are unknown, with these changes potentially occurring frequently during the scanning session. In order to provide greater power to detect rapid connectivity changes, we propose a fully automated two-stage approach which pools information across multiple subjects to estimate change points in functional connectivity, and subsequently estimates the brain networks within each state phase lying between consecutive change points. The number and positioning of the change points are unknown and learned from the data in the first stage, by modeling a time-dependent connectivity metric under a fused lasso approach. In the second stage, the brain functional network for each state phase is inferred via sparse inverse covariance matrices. We compare the performance of the method with existing dynamic connectivity approaches via extensive simulation studies, and apply the proposed approach to a saccade block task fMRI data.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetBrain functional connectivityChange point modelsDynamic networksFused lassoGraphical modelsPrecision matrix estimation

Identifiers

PMID30048750
PMCPMC6197899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.