ArticleVision research2018
Orientation information in encoding facial expressions.
Article in Vision research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Horizontal face information is the main gateway to the shape and surface cues to familiar face identity.PloS one · 2024Article
- Nonlocal contrast calculated by the second order visual mechanisms and its significance in identifying facial emotions.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Orientation Information in Encoding Facial Expressions for People With Central Vision Loss.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019Article
- Article
- Orientation information in encoding facial expressions.Vision research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research showed that we use different regions of a face to categorize different facial expressions, e.g. mouth region for identifying happy faces; eyebrows, eyes and upper part of nose for identifying angry faces. These findings imply that the spatial information along or close to the horizontal orientation might be more useful than others for facial expression recognition. In this study, we examined how the performance for recognizing facial expression depends on the spatial information along different orientations, and whether the pixel-level differences in the face images could account for subjects' performance. Four facial expressions-angry, fearful, happy and sad-were tested. An orientation filter (bandwidth = 23°) was applied to restrict information within the face images, with the center of the filter ranged from 0° (horizontal) to 150° in steps of 30°. Accuracy for recognizing facial expression was measured for an unfiltered and the six filtered conditions. For all four facial expressions, recognition performance (normalized d') was virtually identical for filter orientations of -30°, horizontal and 30°, and declined systematically as the filter orientation approached vertical. The information contained in mouth and eye regions is a significant predictor for subject's response (based on the confusion patterns). We conclude that young adults with normal vision categorizes facial expression most effectively based on the spatial information around the horizontal orientation which captures primary changes of facial features across expressions. Across all spatial orientations, the information contained in mouth and eye regions contributes significantly to facial expression categorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.