Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048564›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2018

Rotavirus vaccination and short-term risk of adverse events in US infants.

J Bradley Layton, Anne M Butler, Catherine A Panozzo, M Alan Brookhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J Bradley LaytonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-5820
Anne M ButlerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Catherine A PanozzoDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
M Alan BrookhartDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USHarvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Patterns of use, comparative effectiveness, and safety of rotavirus vaccinesR21HD080214 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BROOKHART, MAURICE ALAN · 2014 to 2015
$413k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD080214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term risk of adverse events associated with rotavirus vaccine (RV) in infants, overall and by vaccine formulation (three-dose pentavalent, RV5; two-dose monovalent, RV1).

methodsWe identified US newborns with commercial insurance during 2006-2014 receiving a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTaP) dose and assessed if RV was administered concurrently. We followed infants for 30 days after each dose for diagnoses of intussusception, other gastrointestinal events, seizures, Kawasaki disease, thrombocytopenia, otitis media, all-cause emergency department visits, and all-cause hospitalisations. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models comparing: (a) those receiving DTaP+RV vs those receiving DTaP alone; and (b) RV5 vs RV1. Analyses were performed separately within DTaP doses and then meta-analysed across doses.

resultsWe identified 1 031 431 first DTaP doses, 821 833 second doses, and 615 293 third doses; 79.2% had a concurrent RV, 94.1% of which were RV5. Absolute risks of serious outcomes were very low. Compared to infants who received DTaP alone, infants who received RV+DTaP did not experience consistently increased risk of intussusception (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68, 1.88) or any other outcome except for otitis media after dose 2: HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15. This increased otitis media risk was not as pronounced in RV5 when comparing RV5 to RV1; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89, 0.95.

conclusionsThese data were not consistent with an increased risk of intussusception or other adverse events following vaccination with RV, except potentially for a small increased risk of otitis media, particularly in RV1.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntussusceptionMaleOtitis MediaRotavirus VaccinesUnited StatesVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesRotavirus Vaccinesadministrative claimsepidemiologyimmunisationintussusceptionsafety

Identifiers

PMID30048564
PMCPMC6191318
OpenAlexW2884966882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.