Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048547›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

A low FODMAP diet is associated with changes in the microbiota and reduction in breath hydrogen but not colonic volume in healthy subjects.

Tim J Sloan, Jonna Jalanka, Giles A D Major, Shanthi Krishnasamy, Sue Pritchard, Salah Abdelrazig, Katri Korpela, Gulzar Singh, Claire Mulvenna, Caroline L Hoad and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Modern concepts of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim J SloanThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-7775
Jonna JalankaThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-8136
Giles A D MajorThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Shanthi KrishnasamyThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sue PritchardThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Salah AbdelrazigThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Katri KorpelaImmunobiology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Gulzar SinghThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Claire MulvennaThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Caroline L HoadThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5483-1027
Luca MarcianiThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
David A BarrettThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Miranda C E LomerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Willem M de VosImmunobiology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Penny A GowlandThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Robin C SpillerThe NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsIngestion of poorly digested, fermentable carbohydrates (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols; FODMAPs) have been implicated in exacerbating intestinal symptoms and the reduction of intake with symptom alleviation. Restricting FODMAP intake is believed to relieve colonic distension by reducing colonic fermentation but this has not been previously directly assessed. We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of a low FODMAP diet combined with either maltodextrin or oligofructose on colonic contents, metabolites and microbiota.

methodsA parallel randomised controlled trial in healthy adults (n = 37). All subjects followed a low FODMAP diet for a week and supplemented their diet with either maltodextrin (MD) or oligofructose (OF) 7g twice daily. Fasted assessments performed pre- and post-diet included MRI to assess colonic volume, breath testing for hydrogen and methane, and stool collection for microbiota analysis.

resultsThe low FODMAP diet was associated with a reduction in Bifidobacterium and breath hydrogen, which was reversed by oligofructose supplementation. The difference in breath hydrogen between groups post-intervention was 27ppm (95% CI 7 to 50, P<0.01). Colonic volume increased significantly from baseline in both groups (OF increased 110ml (19.6%), 95% CI 30ml to 190ml, P = 0.01; MD increased 90ml (15.5%), 95% CI 6ml to 175ml, P = 0.04) with no significant difference between them. Colonic volumes correlated with total breath hydrogen + methane. A divergence in Clostridiales abundance was observed with increased abundance of Ruminococcaceae in the maltodextrin group, while in the oligofructose group, Lachnospiraceae decreased. Subjects in either group with high methane production also tended to have high microbial diversity, high colonic volume and greater abundance of methanogens.

conclusionA low FODMAP diet reduces total bacterial count and gas production with little effect on colonic volume.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPrebioticsAdultBreath TestsColonDiet, HealthyDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansHydrogenMaleMetabolomeOligosaccharidesOrgan SizeHydrogenmaltodextrinoligofructoseOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID30048547
PMCPMC6062106
OpenAlexW2884941238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.