ArticlePloS one2018
Investigation of wound healing process guided by nano-scale topographic patterns integrated within a microfluidic system.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Surface Deformation of Biocompatible Materials: Recent Advances in Biological Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Contact Guidance of Connective Tissue Fibroblasts on Submicrometer Anisotropic Topographical Cues Is Dependent on Tissue of Origin, β1 Integrins, and Tensin-1 Recruitment.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- Spatially selective cell treatment and collection for integrative drug testing using hydrodynamic flow focusing and shifting.PloS one · 2023Article
- Engineered Nanotechnology: An Effective Therapeutic Platform for the Chronic Cutaneous Wound.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Microfluidic and Lab-on-a-Chip Systems for Cutaneous Wound Healing Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Microphysiological systems for the modeling of wound healing and evaluation of pro-healing therapies.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When living tissues are injured, they undergo a sequential process of homeostasis, inflammation, proliferation and maturation, which is called wound healing. The working mechanism of wound healing has not been wholly understood due to its complex environments with various mechanical and chemical factors. In this study, we propose a novel in vitro wound healing model using a microfluidic system that can manipulate the topography of the wound bed. The topography of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the wound bed is one of the most important mechanical properties for rapid and effective wound healing. We focused our work on the topographical factor which is one of crucial mechanical cues in wound healing process by using various nano-patterns on the cell attachment surface. First, we analyzed the cell morphology and dynamic cellular behaviors of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts on the nano-patterned surface. Their morphology and dynamic behaviors were investigated for relevance with regard to the recovery function. Second, we developed a highly reproducible and inexpensive research platform for wound formation and the wound healing process by combining the nano-patterned surface and a microfluidic channel. The effect of topography on wound recovery performance was analyzed. This in vitro wound healing research platform will provide well-controlled topographic cue of wound bed and contribute to the study on the fundamental mechanism of wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.