Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048491›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Experience feedback committees: A way of implementing a root cause analysis practice in hospital medical departments.

Patrice François, André Lecoanet, Alban Caporossi, Anne-Marie Dols, Arnaud Seigneurin, Bastien Boussat

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrice FrançoisPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-7612
André LecoanetPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Alban CaporossiPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-8438
Anne-Marie DolsPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Arnaud SeigneurinPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Bastien BoussatPublic Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0725-9122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience feedback committee (EFC) is a tool designed to involve medical teams in patient safety management, through root cause analysis (RCA) within the team.

objectivesTo investigate the functioning of EFCs in the departments of a large university-affiliated hospital in France and to consider its potential contribution to the management of patient safety.

methodsCross-sectional, observational study, based on an analysis of the documents produced by the EFCs for 1 year. Data were collected independently by two investigators in meeting minutes, adverse event reports and event analysis reports.

resultsThe study included all 20 EFCs operating in the hospital's medical departments. During the study year, committees held 164 meetings, reviewed 1707 adverse events, conducted 91 event analyses and decided on 206 corrective actions. The median number of corrective actions adopted by each EFC was five actions (range, 0-62). A root cause analysis (RCA) was present in 76% of the analysis reports, and these analyses were complete in only 23% of the reports. There was also a lack of planning corrective actions: an implementation deadline was only defined in 26% of the actions.

conclusionsHealthcare professionals adhered to the system-based approach to patient safety, but we observed difficulties in holding regular meetings and deviations from the theoretical framework. These findings confirm the difficulties of practicing RCA in the healthcare setting. Nevertheless, EFCs can be vectors of safety culture and teamwork.

Indexed as

Hospital DepartmentsPatient SafetyProfessional Staff CommitteesSafety ManagementCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRisk ManagementRoot Cause Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30048491
PMCPMC6062066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.