Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048466›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The evaluation of Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a patient perspective.

Anna Charinna B Amparo, Sarah I Jayme, Maria Concepcion R Roces, Maria Consorcia L Quizon, Maria Luisa L Mercado, Maria Pinky Z Dela Cruz, Dianne A Licuan, Ernesto E S Villalon, Mario S Baquilod, Leda M Hernandez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Human rabies: prospects for elimination.CAB reviews : perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Charinna B AmparoGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Sta. Rosa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-3983
Sarah I JaymeGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Sta. Rosa City, Philippines.
Maria Concepcion R RocesSouth Asia Field Epidemiology and Technology Network (SAFETYNET), Quezon City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-9529
Maria Consorcia L QuizonSouth Asia Field Epidemiology and Technology Network (SAFETYNET), Quezon City, Philippines.
Maria Luisa L MercadoGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Sta. Rosa City, Philippines.
Maria Pinky Z Dela CruzGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Sta. Rosa City, Philippines.
Dianne A LicuanGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Sta. Rosa City, Philippines.
Ernesto E S VillalonDisease Prevention and Control Bureau, Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
Mario S BaquilodDisease Prevention and Control Bureau, Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
Leda M HernandezDisease Prevention and Control Bureau, Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
Louise H TaylorGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Manhattan, United States of America.
Louis H NelGlobal Alliance for Rabies Control, Manhattan, United States of America.
Global Alliance for Rabies Control · USDepartment of Health · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Philippines has built an extensive decentralised network of Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to help bite victims receive timely rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) at little cost. This study surveyed patients in the community and at ABTCs of three provinces to assess animal bite/scratch incidence, health-seeking behaviour and PEP-related out-of pocket expenses (OOPE). METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsDuring community surveys in 90 barangays (neighbourhoods), 53% of households reported at least one animal bite /scratch injury over the past 3 years, similar across urban and rural barangays. Overall bite/scratch incidences in 2016-17 were 67.3, 41.9 and 48.8 per 1,000 population per year for Nueva Vizcaya, Palawan and Tarlac respectively. Incidences were around 50% higher amongst those under 15 years of age, compared to -those older than 15. Household awareness of the nearest ABTCs was generally over 80%, but only 44.9% sought proper medical treatment and traditional remedies were still frequently used. The proportion of patients seeking PEP was not related to the distance or travel time to the nearest ABTC. For those that did not seek medical treatment, most cited a lack of awareness or insufficient funds and almost a third visited a traditional healer. No deaths from bite/scratch injuries were reported. A cohort of 1,105 patients were interviewed at six ABTCs in early 2017. OOPE varied across the ABTCs, from 5.53 USD to 37.83 USD per patient, primarily dependent on the need to pay for immunization if government supplies had run out. Overall, 78% of patients completed the recommended course, and the main reason for non-completion was a lack of time, followed by insufficient funds. Dog observation data revealed that 85% of patients were not truly exposed to rabies, and education in bite prevention might reduce provoked bites and demand for PEP. An accompanying paper details the ABTC network from the health provider's perspective.

Indexed as

Bites and StingsAdolescentAdultAnimalsCatsChildChild, PreschoolDogsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePhilippinesPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRabies

Identifiers

PMID30048466
PMCPMC6062032
OpenAlexW2883622091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.