Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048452›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Genome-wide analysis of NGS data to compile cancer-specific panels of miRNA biomarkers.

Shib Sankar Bhowmick, Indrajit Saha, Debotosh Bhattacharjee, Loredana M Genovese, Filippo Geraci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Expression Patterns ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shib Sankar BhowmickDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Indrajit SahaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers' Training & Research, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9513-9707
Debotosh BhattacharjeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Loredana M GenoveseInstitute for Informatics and telematics, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Filippo GeraciInstitute for Informatics and telematics, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Institute of Informatics and Telematics · ITJadavpur University · INNational Institute of Technical Teachers’ Training and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that influence gene expression by binding to the 3' UTR of target mRNAs in order to repress protein synthesis. Soon after discovery, microRNA dysregulation has been associated to several pathologies. In particular, they have often been reported as differentially expressed in healthy and tumor samples. This fact suggested that microRNAs are likely to be good candidate biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and personalized medicine. With the advent of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), measuring the expression level of the whole miRNAome at once is now routine. Yet, the collaborative effort of sharing data opens to the possibility of population analyses. This context motivated us to perform an in-silico study to distill cancer-specific panels of microRNAs that can serve as biomarkers. We observed that the problem of finding biomarkers can be modeled as a two-class classification task where, given the miRNAomes of a population of healthy and cancerous samples, we want to find the subset of microRNAs that leads to the highest classification accuracy. We fulfill this task leveraging on a sensible combination of data mining tools. In particular, we used: differential evolution for candidate selection, component analysis to preserve the relationships among miRNAs, and SVM for sample classification. We identified 10 cancer-specific panels whose classification accuracy is always higher than 92%. These panels have a very little overlap suggesting that miRNAs are not only predictive of the onset of cancer, but can be used for classification purposes as well. We experimentally validated the contribution of each of the employed tools to the selection of discriminating miRNAs. Moreover, we tested the significance of each panel for the corresponding cancer type. In particular, enrichment analysis showed that the selected miRNAs are involved in oncogenesis pathways, while survival analysis proved that miRNAs can be used to evaluate cancer severity. Summarizing: results demonstrated that our method is able to produce cancer-specific panels that are promising candidates for a subsequent in vitro validation.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBiomarkers, TumorData MiningHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID30048452
PMCPMC6061989
OpenAlexW2883686589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.