Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048446›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Auditory midbrain coding of statistical learning that results from discontinuous sensory stimulation.

Hugo Cruces-Solís, Zhizi Jing, Olga Babaev, Jonathan Rubin, Burak Gür, Dilja Krueger-Burg, Nicola Strenzke, Livia de Hoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Listening loops and the adapting auditory brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neurod1 Is Essential for the Primary Tonotopic Organization and Related Auditory Information Processing in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hugo Cruces-SolísDepartment of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
Zhizi JingAuditory Systems Physiology Group, InnerEarLab, Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Olga BabaevInternational Max Planck Research School Neurosciences, Göttingen Graduate School for Neurosciences and Molecular Biosciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Jonathan RubinHolon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.
Burak GürInternational Max Planck Research School Neurosciences, Göttingen Graduate School for Neurosciences and Molecular Biosciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Dilja Krueger-BurgDepartment of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
Nicola StrenzkeAuditory Systems Physiology Group, InnerEarLab, Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Livia de HozDepartment of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1548-8809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting regular patterns in the environment, a process known as statistical learning, is essential for survival. Neuronal adaptation is a key mechanism in the detection of patterns that are continuously repeated across short (seconds to minutes) temporal windows. Here, we found in mice that a subcortical structure in the auditory midbrain was sensitive to patterns that were repeated discontinuously, in a temporally sparse manner, across windows of minutes to hours. Using a combination of behavioral, electrophysiological, and molecular approaches, we found changes in neuronal response gain that varied in mechanism with the degree of sound predictability and resulted in changes in frequency coding. Analysis of population activity (structural tuning) revealed an increase in frequency classification accuracy in the context of increased overlap in responses across frequencies. The increase in accuracy and overlap was paralleled at the behavioral level in an increase in generalization in the absence of diminished discrimination. Gain modulation was accompanied by changes in gene and protein expression, indicative of long-term plasticity. Physiological changes were largely independent of corticofugal feedback, and no changes were seen in upstream cochlear nucleus responses, suggesting a key role of the auditory midbrain in sensory gating. Subsequent behavior demonstrated learning of predictable and random patterns and their importance in auditory conditioning. Using longer timescales than previously explored, the combined data show that the auditory midbrain codes statistical learning of temporally sparse patterns, a process that is critical for the detection of relevant stimuli in the constant soundscape that the animal navigates through.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysBehavior, AnimalCochleaEvoked PotentialsFemaleInferior ColliculiMesencephalonMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronal PlasticitySoundSynapses

Identifiers

PMID30048446
PMCPMC6065201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.