ArticlePLoS biology2018
Auditory midbrain coding of statistical learning that results from discontinuous sensory stimulation.
Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical learning dynamically shapes auditory perception.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Article
- Noises on-How the Brain Deals with Acoustic Noise.Biology · 2024Review
- Headplate Installation and Craniotomy for Awake In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings or Two-Photon Imaging of the Mouse Inferior Colliculus.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- Novelty detection in an auditory oddball task on freely moving rats.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The perceptual categorization of multidimensional stimuli is hierarchically organized.iScience · 2023Article
- Development of frequency tuning shaped by spatial cue reliability in the barn owl's auditory midbrain.eLife · 2023Article
- Subcortical coding of predictable and unsupervised sound-context associations.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Listening loops and the adapting auditory brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Refinements to rodent head fixation and fluid/food control for neuroscience.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Review
- A role of oligodendrocytes in information processing.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Auditory processing in the zebra finch midbrain: single unit responses and effect of rearing experience.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Neurod1 Is Essential for the Primary Tonotopic Organization and Related Auditory Information Processing in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Wide sensory filters underlie performance in memory-based discrimination and generalization.PloS one · 2019Article
- Neural Correlates of Learning Pure Tones or Natural Sounds in the Auditory Cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2019Article
- IgSF9b regulates anxiety behaviors through effects on centromedial amygdala inhibitory synapses.Nature communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting regular patterns in the environment, a process known as statistical learning, is essential for survival. Neuronal adaptation is a key mechanism in the detection of patterns that are continuously repeated across short (seconds to minutes) temporal windows. Here, we found in mice that a subcortical structure in the auditory midbrain was sensitive to patterns that were repeated discontinuously, in a temporally sparse manner, across windows of minutes to hours. Using a combination of behavioral, electrophysiological, and molecular approaches, we found changes in neuronal response gain that varied in mechanism with the degree of sound predictability and resulted in changes in frequency coding. Analysis of population activity (structural tuning) revealed an increase in frequency classification accuracy in the context of increased overlap in responses across frequencies. The increase in accuracy and overlap was paralleled at the behavioral level in an increase in generalization in the absence of diminished discrimination. Gain modulation was accompanied by changes in gene and protein expression, indicative of long-term plasticity. Physiological changes were largely independent of corticofugal feedback, and no changes were seen in upstream cochlear nucleus responses, suggesting a key role of the auditory midbrain in sensory gating. Subsequent behavior demonstrated learning of predictable and random patterns and their importance in auditory conditioning. Using longer timescales than previously explored, the combined data show that the auditory midbrain codes statistical learning of temporally sparse patterns, a process that is critical for the detection of relevant stimuli in the constant soundscape that the animal navigates through.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.