ArticleJournal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology2019
Bronchoscopically Delivered Thermal Vapor Ablation of Human Lung Lesions.
Article in Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The unified front: a multidisciplinary approach in the Era of uniportal thoracic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Advanced Imaging for Robotic Bronchoscopy: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cone beam CT augmented fluoroscopy allows safe and efficient diagnosis of a difficult lung nodule.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Article
- Image-guided combined ablation and resection in thoracic surgery for the treatment of multiple pulmonary metastases: A preliminary case series.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- Alternative methods for local ablation-interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Review
- Bronchoscopic ablation of peripheral lung tumors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe discovery that early diagnosis can reduce the mortality of lung cancer provides firm evidence that early surgical intervention is effective. However, surgical resection is available only to those who are healthy enough to tolerate the procedure. Vapor ablation may provide an additional method of treating the lung cancer patient, and has been studied in humans for emphysema treatment. In swine, we previously demonstrated that bronchoscopically delivered thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) could be accurately applied, was uniform, anatomically confined, and was tolerated by the animal. To provide evidence that BTVA may be a feasible method of treatment in humans, and since human and swine lungs have differing airway and segmental anatomy, we extended our studies to deceased human lungs to determine if anatomically confined and uniform ablations could be obtained with levels of energy comparable with our swine and human emphysema studies.
methodsWe obtained fresh, deceased human lungs and performed BTVA with increasing energy in subsegmental regions of lung containing tumors as well as non-tumor-containing areas in order to determine if uniform ablations with sharp boundaries could be obtained in human lung.
resultsWe found that all ablations were anatomically contained. The frequency of uniform ablation effect was dependent on the total energy delivered and was achieved at a greater frequency than those with sharp boundaries. If a lung tumor was contained within the anatomy of the subsegment, the ablation zone completely surrounded the tumor.
conclusionWe conclude that BTVA may have a future role in the treatment of lung cancer and should be investigated further in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.