Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30048332›Full record

Observational studyCritical care medicine2018

Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States-An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level.

Carly J Paoli, Mark A Reynolds, Meenal Sinha, Matthew Gitlin, Elliott Crouser

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 363 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
363citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06991686 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic Value of Procalcitonin Vs Platelet/Total Leukocytic Count Ratio in 28 Days Outcome in Severe Septic Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAll Conditions Causing Sepsis, Pneumonia - Bacterial, Urinary Tract Infection BacterialArmsBlood samples, blood sample
NCT07167173 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2025 to 2025Enrolled10,000ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock
NCT07436130 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Immunomodulatory Effect of Curcumin in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis at the Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde": A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2026 to 2027Enrolled56ConditionsSepsisArmsCurcumin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

363 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Healthcare costs after sepsis: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

303 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carly J PaoliHealth Economics and Reimbursement, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA.
Mark A ReynoldsHealth Economics and Reimbursement, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA.
Meenal SinhaPremier Applied Sciences, Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC.
Matthew GitlinHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, BluePath Solutions, Los Angeles, CA.
Elliott CrouserCritical Care Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize the current burden, outcomes, and costs of managing sepsis patients in U.S. hospitals.

designA retrospective observational study was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database, which represents ~20% of U.S. inpatient discharges among private and academic hospitals. Hospital costs were obtained from billing records per the cost accounting method used by each hospital. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient demographics, characteristics, and clinical and economic outcomes for the index hospitalization and 30-day readmissions.

settingSepsis patient hospitalizations, including inpatient, general ward, and ICU (intermediate and/or step-down). PATIENTS: Adults over 18 years old with a hospital discharge diagnosis code of sepsis from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2016.

interventionsNone. This was a retrospective observational study of deidentified data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe final study cohort consisted of 2,566,689 sepsis cases, representing patients with a mean age of 65 years (50.8% female). Overall mortality was 12.5% but varied greatly by severity (5.6%, 14.9%, and 34.2%) for sepsis without organ dysfunction, severe sepsis, and septic shock, respectively. Costs followed a similar pattern increasing by severity level: $16,324, $24,638, and $38,298 and varied widely by sepsis present at admission ($18,023) and not present at admission ($51,022).

conclusionsThe highest burden of incidence and total costs occurred in the lowest severity sepsis cohort population. Sepsis cases not diagnosed until after admission, and those with increasing severity had a higher economic burden and mortality on a case-by-case basis. Methods to improve early identification of sepsis may provide opportunities for reducing the severity and economic burden of sepsis in the United States.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHospital ChargesHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPatient ReadmissionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30048332
PMCPMC6250243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.