Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30047611›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2019

Prophylactic closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy is associated with decreased surgical site infection in high-risk colorectal surgery laparotomy wounds.

T Curran, D Alvarez, J Pastrana Del Valle, T E Cataldo, V Poylin, D Nagle

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03716687 (Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03716687 naterminatednot on this map

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Borbala HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsSurgical Wound, Wound Dehiscence, Surgical, Surgical Site Infection, Dehiscence of Internal Surgical WoundArmsProphylactic negative pressure wound dressing after laparotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Silver in Wound Care-Friend or Foe?: A Comprehensive Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T CurranDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
D AlvarezDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Pastrana Del ValleDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
T E CataldoDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
V PoylinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
D NagleDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSurgical site infection in colorectal surgery is associated with significant healthcare costs, which may be reduced by using a closed-incision negative-pressure therapy device. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy on the incidence of surgical site infection.

methodIn this retrospective cohort study we evaluated all patients who had undergone high-risk open colorectal surgery at a single tertiary care centre from 2012 to 2016. We compared the incidence of surgical site infection between those receiving standard postoperative wound care between 2012 and 2014 and those receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy via a customizable device (Prevena Incision Management System, KCI, an Acelity company, San Antonio, Texas, USA) between 2014 and 2016. A validated surgical site infection risk score was used to create a 1:1 matched cohort subset.

resultsNegative pressure therapy was used in 77 patients and compared with 238 controls. Negative pressure patients were more likely to have a stoma (92% vs 48%, P < 0.01) and to be smokers (33% vs 15%, P < 0.01). Surgical site infection was higher in control patients (15%, n = 35/238) compared with negative pressure patients (7%, n = 5/77) (P = 0.05). On regression analysis, negative pressure therapy was associated with decreased surgical site infection (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.78). These differences persisted in the matched analysis.

conclusionNegative pressure therapy was associated with decreased surgical site infection. Negative pressure therapy offers significant potential for quality improvement.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesColectomyDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIntestine, SmallLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyOperative TimeProctectomyRetrospective StudiesRiskClosed incision negative pressure therapyquality improvementsurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID30047611
PMCPMC7380040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.