Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30047360›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2018

The Burden of Typhoid Fever in South Africa: The Potential Impact of Selected Interventions.

Karen H Keddy, Anthony M Smith, Arvinda Sooka, Nomsa P Tau, Hlengiwe M P Ngomane, Amruta Radhakrishnan, Daina Als, Frew G Benson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence ofVeterinary world · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Burden of Typhoid Fever in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Perspective.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Typhoid Fever: Way Forward.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen H KeddyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Anthony M SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Arvinda SookaCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nomsa P TauCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Hlengiwe M P NgomaneCentre for Enteric Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Amruta RadhakrishnanCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Daina AlsCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Frew G BensonGauteng Provincial Health Department, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typhoid fever is notifiable in South Africa but clinical notification is notoriously poor. South Africa has an estimated annual incidence rate of 0.1 cases per 100,000 population of culture-confirmed typhoid fever, decreased from 17 cases per 100,000 population in the 1980s. This work was undertaken to identify the reasons for this decrease and identify potential weaknesses that may result in an increase of observed cases. Culture-confirmed cases, with additional demographic and clinical data have been collected from selected sentinel sites since 2003. Data on contextual factors (gross domestic product [GDP], sanitation, female education, and childhood diarrhea mortality) were collected. National incidence rates of culture-confirmed typhoid fever have remained constant for the past 13 years, with the exception of an outbreak in 2005: incidence was 0.4 per 100,000 population. Paratyphoid fever remains a rare disease. Antimicrobial susceptibility data suggest resistance to ciprofloxacin and azithromycin is emerging. The South African population increased from 27.5 million in 1980 to 55.0 million in 2015: urbanization increased from 50% to 65%, GDP increased from United States Dollar (USD) $2,910 to USD $6,167, access to sanitation improved from 64.4% to 70.0% in the urban population and 26.4% to 60.5% in rural areas. Female literacy levels improved from 74.8% to 92.6% over the period. Improved socioeconomic circumstances in South Africa have been temporally associated with decreasing incidence rates of typhoid fever over a 35-year period. Ongoing challenges remain including potential for large outbreaks, a large immigrant population, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Continued active surveillance is mandatory.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMolecular EpidemiologyParatyphoid FeverPopulation SurveillanceSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhiSouth AfricaTyphoid FeverAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30047360
PMCPMC6128358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.