Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30047116›Full record

ArticleGenes & genomics2018

Two new complete mitochondrial genomes of Dorcus stag beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae).

YongJing Chen, Jing Liu, YuYan Cao, Shiju Zhou, Xia Wan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterisation of the complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

YongJing ChenDepartment of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
YuYan CaoDepartment of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
Shiju ZhouDepartment of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
Xia WanDepartment of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Road, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China. wanxia@ahu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31071954National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31201745National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31572311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systematics of Dorcus MacLeay has been a long-standing debate. Mitochondrial genomes were widely used to deeply understand the phylogeny of problematic taxa in virtue of their genetic importance and comprehensiveness. To provide more useful genetic data for resolving the systematic disputation of Dorcus stag beetles. The complete mitochondrial genomes of Dorcus hopei and Dorcus seguyi were obtained using the next generation sequencing. Characteristics of the two genomes are explicated through comparing their genome organization and base composition, protein-coding genes and codon usage, intergenic spacers and non-coding region, transfer and ribosomal RNA genes and control region. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed using Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs from 9 stag beetles and 3 scarab beetles. The complete mitogenomes of D. hopei and D. seguyi was 16,026 bp/17,955 bp long, respectively. A tandem repeat with the length of 940 bp was presented in the A+T-rich region in D. hopei. An unexpected non-coding region of 332 bp was located between nad2 and trnW in D. seguyi. The phylogenetic analyses robustly supported that D. hopei formed a branch with the generic type of D. parallelipipedus. Whereas D. seguyi was not covered in the branch of (D. hopei + D. parallelipipedus), but was sister to them. The results indicated that D. hopei should be a good member of Dorcus MacLeay. The taxonomic status of D. seguyi remained to be studied furtherly.

Indexed as

Whole Genome SequencingAnimalsBase SequenceColeopteraGenome, InsectGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyDorcus hopeiDorcus seguyiMitochondrial genomePhylogenetic analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.