Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30047101›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Update: 10 Years of Sleeve Gastrectomy-the First 103 Patients.

Daniel M Felsenreich, Lukas M Ladinig, Philipp Beckerhinn, Christoph Sperker, Katrin Schwameis, Michael Krebs, Julia Jedamzik, Magdalena Eilenberg, Christoph Bichler, Gerhard Prager and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antireflux mucosectomy as an effective treatment for GERD after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M FelsenreichDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Lukas M LadinigDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Philipp BeckerhinnDepartment of Surgery, Hollabrunn Hospital, Hollabrunn, Austria.
Christoph SperkerDepartment of Surgery, Rudolfsstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Katrin SchwameisDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Michael KrebsDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vienna Medical University, Wien, Austria.
Julia JedamzikDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Magdalena EilenbergDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Christoph Bichler
Gerhard PragerDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria. gerhard.prager@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-0257-4844
Felix B LangerDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATRudolfinerhaus Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide since 2014. Therefore, it is vital to look at its outcomes in a long-term follow-up based on a large patient collective. Main points of discussion are weight regain, reflux, and patients' quality of life at 10+ years after the procedure.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to present an update of data that have been published recently and, thus, achieve more conclusive results. The number of patients has been doubled, and the length of the follow-up is still 10+ years.

settingMulti-center study, medical university clinic, Austria

methodsThis study includes all patients who had SG before December 2006 at the participating bariatric centers. At 10+ years, non-converted patients (67%) were examined using gastroscopy, manometry, 24-hour pH-metry, and questionnaires. Patients' history of weight, comorbidities, and reflux were established through interviews.

resultsAt 10+ years after SG, the authors found a conversion rate of 33%, an %EWL in non-converted patients of 50.0 ± 22.5, reflux in 57%, and Barrett's metaplasia in 14% of non-converted patients. Gastroscopies revealed that patients with reflux were significantly more likely to have de-novo hiatal hernia. A significantly lower quality of life was detected through GIQLI and BAROS in patients with reflux.

conclusionThe authors recommend gastroscopies at 5-year intervals after SG to detect the possible sequelae of reflux at an early stage. Conversion to Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) works well to cure patients from reflux but may not be as efficient at treating weight regain.

Indexed as

AdultAustriaBarrett EsophagusComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxGastroscopyHernia, HiatalHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidComorbiditiesConversionLong-term follow-upQuality of lifeRefluxRoux-en-Y-gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomyWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID30047101
OpenAlexW2883667387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.